These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8582354)

  • 1. Statistical and genetic aspects of quality control for DNA identification.
    Morton NE; Collins AE
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1670-7. PubMed ID: 8582354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood ratios for DNA identification.
    Collins A; Morton NE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Jun; 91(13):6007-11. PubMed ID: 8016106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA forensic science 1995.
    Morton NE
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1995; 3(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7552142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logical implications of applying the principles of population genetics to the interpretation of DNA profiling evidence.
    Triggs CM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):108-14. PubMed ID: 12175788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.
    Haned H; Gill P; Lohmueller K; Inman K; Rudin N
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 26976468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A forensic STR profiling system for the Eurasian badger: a framework for developing profiling systems for wildlife species.
    Dawnay N; Ogden R; Thorpe RS; Pope LC; Dawson DA; McEwing R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 19083789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic structure of forensic populations.
    Morton NE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1992 Apr; 89(7):2556-60. PubMed ID: 1557360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence.
    Thompson WC; Taroni F; Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 12570198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Likelihood ratio and posterior odds in forensic genetics: Two sides of the same coin.
    Caliebe A; Walsh S; Liu F; Kayser M; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():203-210. PubMed ID: 28314239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When can a DNA profile be regarded as unique?
    Balding DJ
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 10795416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA single locus profiles: tests for the robustness of statistical procedures within the context of forensic science.
    Evett IW; Pinchin R
    Int J Legal Med; 1991; 104(5):267-72. PubMed ID: 1685892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When science takes the witness stand.
    Neufeld PJ; Colman N
    Sci Am; 1990 May; 262(5):46-53. PubMed ID: 1970671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
    Egeland T; Slooten K
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the statistical power of DNA-based identification, exemplified by 'The missing grandchildren of Argentina'.
    Kling D; Egeland T; Piñero MH; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():57-66. PubMed ID: 28858673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.
    Brenner CH; Inman K
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):192-3; author reply 194-5. PubMed ID: 14979377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.
    Cotton RW; Word CJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1200; author reply 1202. PubMed ID: 14535702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.