These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8582354)

  • 21. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003 Jan.;48(1):47-54.
    Clarke GW
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1201; author reply 1202. PubMed ID: 14535703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of HLA-DRB1 genotyping by oligonucleotide micro-array technology in forensic medicine.
    Jiang B; Li Y; Wu H; He X; Li C; Li L; Tang R; Xie Y; Mao Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):66-73. PubMed ID: 16884876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The 1998-1999 collaborative exercises and proficiency testing program on DNA typing of the Spanish and Portuguese Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (GEP-ISFG).
    Gómez J; Carracedo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Oct; 114(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10924847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identical twins in forensic genetics - Epidemiology and risk based estimation of weight of evidence.
    Tvedebrink T; Morling N
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 26654075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application of random match probability calculations to mixed STR profiles.
    Bille T; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):474-85. PubMed ID: 23425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. DNA fingerprinting for forensic identification: some statistical issues.
    Majumder PP
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1684-8. PubMed ID: 8582356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Personal identification using DNA polymorphism--the identification of forensic biological materials].
    Shiono H
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 50(5):320-30. PubMed ID: 8952331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Encoding of low-quality DNA profiles as genotype probability matrices for improved profile comparisons, relatedness evaluation and database searches.
    Ryan K; Williams DG; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():227-239. PubMed ID: 27768939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analytical aspects of population-specific DNA fingerprinting for individuals.
    Smouse PE; Chevillon C
    J Hered; 1998; 89(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 9542162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haned H; Snipen L; Sæbø S; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():93-101. PubMed ID: 24528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining allele frequency uncertainty and population substructure corrections in forensic DNA calculations.
    Cowell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():210-216. PubMed ID: 27231804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.
    Weir BS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1992 Dec; 89(24):11654-9. PubMed ID: 1465380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.
    Holt CL; Buoncristiani M; Wallin JM; Nguyen T; Lazaruk KD; Walsh PS
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):66-96. PubMed ID: 12064672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates.
    Brookfield JF
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):13-9. PubMed ID: 7607450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [STR and RFLP polymorphism in paternity determination based on family investigation].
    Jacewicz R; Szram S
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 15984118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Podruks E; Schwark T; Göpel W; Fimmers R; Poetsch M
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Nov; 129(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 26292643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What is the magnitude of the subpopulation effect?
    Curran JM; Buckleton JS; Triggs CM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Jul; 135(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12893129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.