163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8582501)
1. Intrauterine insemination in male subfertility: a comparative study of sperm preparation using a commercial Percoll kit and conventional sperm wash.
Depypere H; Milingos S; Comhaire F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Oct; 62(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 8582501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
Ohashi K; Saji F; Wakimoto A; Kato M; Tsutsui T; Tanizawa O
Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of sperm preparation methods. Wash and concentration, swim-up, migration-gravity sedimentation, 80% Percoll and semen filtration column.
Matsuoka I; Fujino Y; Ito F; Koh B; Kojima T; Ogita S
J Reprod Med; 1995 May; 40(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 7608872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of stimulated menstrual cycles and Percoll sperm preparation in intrauterine insemination.
Tredway DR; Chan P; Henig I; Gullett A; Cheatwood M
J Reprod Med; 1990 Feb; 35(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 2154579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized comparison of the methods of sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination.
Dodson WC; Moessner J; Miller J; Legro RS; Gnatuk CL
Fertil Steril; 1998 Sep; 70(3):574-5. PubMed ID: 9757895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Percoll wash on sperm motion parameters and subsequent fertility in intrauterine insemination cycles.
Swanson ML; Collins JM; Freiman SF; Dubin NH
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Jan; 12(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 7580010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the effect of the absence of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility on subsequent pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization.
Bollendorf A; Check JH; Lurie D
J Androl; 1996; 17(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 8957699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination.
Zhao Y; Vlahos N; Wyncott D; Petrella C; Garcia J; Zacur H; Wallach EE
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2004 May; 21(5):143-8. PubMed ID: 15279320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
Butt F; Chohan MA
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of time intervals from the end of sperm collection to intrauterine insemination on the pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-intrauterine insemination cycles.
Kuru Pekcan M; Kokanalı D; Kokanalı K; Taşçı Y
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 47(10):561-564. PubMed ID: 30170131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved sperm recovery rate with Percoll gradient method in intrauterine insemination.
Huang HY; Lai YM; Lee CL; Chang MY; Chang SY; Soong YK
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Mar; 19(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8935371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Male subfertility and the outcome of intrauterine insemination.
Möslein-Rossmeissl S; Taubert HD
Andrologia; 1989; 21(6):519-22. PubMed ID: 2619096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD004507. PubMed ID: 17943816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm: a prospective randomized trial comparing three different sperm preparation techniques.
Byrd W; Drobnis EZ; Kutteh WH; Marshburn P; Carr BR
Fertil Steril; 1994 Oct; 62(4):850-6. PubMed ID: 7926098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved semen qualities after continuous-step density gradient centrifugation: application to artificial insemination and pregnancy outcome.
Sato H; Kaneko S; Kobayashi T; Oda T; Ohno T; Iizuka R
Arch Androl; 1990; 24(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 2327816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four methods for sperm preparation for IUI.
Ren SS; Sun GH; Ku CH; Chen DC; Wu GJ
Arch Androl; 2004; 50(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 15204678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency of discontinuous Percoll gradients preparation for selection of motile sperm from poor quality semens.
Sukcharoen N
J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Dec; 77(12):633-8. PubMed ID: 7759973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, prospective analysis of five sperm preparation techniques before intrauterine insemination of husband sperm.
Carrell DT; Kuneck PH; Peterson CM; Hatasaka HH; Jones KP; Campbell BF
Fertil Steril; 1998 Jan; 69(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 9457946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three sperm preparation media.
Sharma RK; Seifarth K; Garlak D; Agarwal A
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
