These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8582724)

  • 1. Adaptive filtering of the electromyographic signal for prosthetic control and force estimation.
    Park E; Meek SG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Oct; 42(10):1048-52. PubMed ID: 8582724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive whitening of the electromyogram to improve amplitude estimation.
    Clancy EA; Farry KA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):709-19. PubMed ID: 10833845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian filtering of myoelectric signals.
    Sanger TD
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 97(2):1839-45. PubMed ID: 17182908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions.
    Farina D; Pozzo M; Merlo E; Bottin A; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1383-93. PubMed ID: 15311823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue compensation of the electromyographic signal for prosthetic control and force estimation.
    Park E; Meek SG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Oct; 40(10):1019-23. PubMed ID: 8294126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of signal-to-noise ratio of myoelectric filters for prosthesis control.
    Meek SG; Fetherston SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(4):9-20. PubMed ID: 1432730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters.
    Disselhorst-Klug C; Silny J; Rau G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Jul; 44(7):567-74. PubMed ID: 9210816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real time microcontroller implementation of an adaptive myoelectric filter.
    Bagwell PJ; Chappell PH
    Med Eng Phys; 1995 Mar; 17(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 7735646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates.
    Potvin JR; Brown SH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 15094152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Filter design for cancellation of baseline-fluctuation in needle EMG recordings.
    Rodríguez-Carreño I; Malanda-Trigueros A; Gila-Useros L; Navallas-Irujo J; Rodríguez-Falces J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 16376451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of adaptive and notch filtering for removing electromagnetic noise from monopolar surface electromyographic signals.
    Beck TW; DeFreitas JM; Cramer JT; Stout JR
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Apr; 30(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 19242048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design and implementation of a hands-free electrolarynx device controlled by neck strap muscle electromyographic activity.
    Goldstein EA; Heaton JT; Kobler JB; Stanley GB; Hillman RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Feb; 51(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 14765705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface EMG and spatial resolution analysis with estimation of electromyographic descriptors.
    Schwartz FP; da Rocha AF; Dos Santos I; Salomoni S; Nascimento FA; Soares F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4748-51. PubMed ID: 19163777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electromyographic sensor design for use with an externally powered prosthetic arm.
    Konigsberg RL
    J Assoc Adv Med Instrum; 1972; 6(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 5079986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Entropy-based optimization of wavelet spatial filters.
    Farina D; Kamavuako EN; Wu J; Naddeo F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):914-22. PubMed ID: 18334382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel vibration-exercise instrument with dedicated adaptive filtering for electromyographic investigation of neuromuscular activation.
    Xu L; Rabotti C; Mischi M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Mar; 21(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 23033335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of adaptive/nonadaptive filtering and wavelet transform techniques for noise reduction in EMG mobile acquisition equipment.
    Ortolan RL; Mori RN; Pereira RR; Cabral CM; Pereira JC; Cliquet AJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 12797727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-frequency analysis and estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during explosive dynamic contractions.
    Merlo E; Pozzo M; Antonutto G; di Prampero PE; Merletti R; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Mar; 142(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 15698666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time and frequency domain responses of the mechanomyogram and electromyogram during isometric ramp contractions: a comparison of the short-time Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms.
    Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Egan AD; Hartman MJ; Herda TJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 17070700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Fourier and wavelet transform procedures for examining the mechanomyographic and electromyographic frequency domain responses during fatiguing isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Apr; 15(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 15664148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.