These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8583163)

  • 1. [Detection of DNA amplifications and deletions in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)].
    Matsumura K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Dec; 62(4):513-31. PubMed ID: 8583163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
    du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
    Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Genetic screening of head-neck carcinomas using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)].
    Bockmühl U; Petersen I; Schwendel A; Dietel M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jul; 75(7):408-14. PubMed ID: 8924169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and refinement of 3q amplification.
    Singh B; Gogineni SK; Sacks PG; Shaha AR; Shah JP; Stoffel A; Rao PH
    Cancer Res; 2001 Jun; 61(11):4506-13. PubMed ID: 11389082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of non-small cell lung carcinoma by spectral karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Luk C; Tsao MS; Bayani J; Shepherd F; Squire JA
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Mar; 125(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11369051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas.
    Lassmann S; Weis R; Makowiec F; Roth J; Danciu M; Hopt U; Werner M
    J Mol Med (Berl); 2007 Mar; 85(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 17143621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genotypic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by molecular cytogenetics and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
    Yen CC; Chen YJ; Lu KH; Hsia JY; Chen JT; Hu CP; Chen PM; Liu JH; Chiou TJ; Wang WS; Yang MH; Chao TC; Lin CH
    Int J Oncol; 2003 Oct; 23(4):871-81. PubMed ID: 12963965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative genomic hybridization of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: the possible involvement of the DPI gene in the 13q34 amplicon.
    Shinomiya T; Mori T; Ariyama Y; Sakabe T; Fukuda Y; Murakami Y; Nakamura Y; Inazawa J
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Apr; 24(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 10092132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 38 breast cancer cell lines: a basis for interpreting complementary DNA microarray data.
    Forozan F; Mahlamäki EH; Monni O; Chen Y; Veldman R; Jiang Y; Gooden GC; Ethier SP; Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP
    Cancer Res; 2000 Aug; 60(16):4519-25. PubMed ID: 10969801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of chromosomal gains and losses in oral squamous cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridisation.
    Hermsen MA; Joenje H; Arwert F; Braakhuis BJ; Baak JP; Westerveld A; Slater R
    Oral Oncol; 1997 Nov; 33(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 9509125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of genetic rearrangements in esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines by a combination of M-FISH and array-CGH: further confirmation of some split genomic regions in primary tumors.
    Hao JJ; Shi ZZ; Zhao ZX; Zhang Y; Gong T; Li CX; Zhan T; Cai Y; Dong JT; Fu SB; Zhan QM; Wang MR
    BMC Cancer; 2012 Aug; 12():367. PubMed ID: 22920630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of oral squamous cell carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization, spectral karyotyping, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Uchida K; Oga A; Okafuji M; Mihara M; Kawauchi S; Furuya T; Chochi Y; Ueyama Y; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Jun; 167(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 16737909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CGH-detected DNA sequence copy number amplifications can be confirmed by interphase-FISH: new possiblities for prognostic approaches in oral squamous cell carcinomas.
    Taubald A; Liehr T; Ries J; Girod S; Hassfurter E; Gebhart E
    Int J Mol Med; 1998 Nov; 2(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 9858651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.
    Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.
    Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Sudar D; Rutovitz D; Gray JW; Waldman F; Pinkel D
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5083):818-21. PubMed ID: 1359641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chromosomal imbalances in oral squamous cell carcinoma: examination of 31 cell lines and review of the literature.
    Martin CL; Reshmi SC; Ried T; Gottberg W; Wilson JW; Reddy JK; Khanna P; Johnson JT; Myers EN; Gollin SM
    Oral Oncol; 2008 Apr; 44(4):369-82. PubMed ID: 17681875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene amplification profiling of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by DNA array CGH.
    Ishizuka T; Tanabe C; Sakamoto H; Aoyagi K; Maekawa M; Matsukura N; Tokunaga A; Tajiri T; Yoshida T; Terada M; Sasaki H
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2002 Aug; 296(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 12147242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consistent and differential genetic aberrations between esophageal dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma detected by array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Shi ZZ; Shang L; Jiang YY; Hao JJ; Zhang Y; Zhang TT; Lin DC; Liu SG; Wang BS; Gong T; Zhan QM; Wang MR
    Clin Cancer Res; 2013 Nov; 19(21):5867-78. PubMed ID: 24009147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a simplified comparative genomic hybridization technique to screen for gene amplification in pediatric solid tumors.
    Bayani J; Thorner P; Zielenska M; Pandita A; Beatty B; Squire JA
    Pediatr Pathol Lab Med; 1995; 15(6):831-44. PubMed ID: 8705194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis reveals 3q gain resulting in genetic alteration in 3q in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Oga A; Kong G; Tae K; Lee Y; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 May; 127(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 11408060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.