These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8583195)

  • 1. Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):159-71. PubMed ID: 8583195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 9540230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of pre-trial response requirements on self-control choices by rats and pigeons.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Mar; 97(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 22389527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.
    Mazur JE; Kralik JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):175-87. PubMed ID: 2299287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.
    Grossbard CL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 21541170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE; Rodriguez ML; Kabela E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Sep; 46(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 3760749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of indifference points with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 3346621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of response rate on reward value in a self-control task.
    Fortes I; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 25533528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 7714448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE; Romano A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Nov; 58(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 1447543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 May; 83(3):263-79. PubMed ID: 16050037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 6736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.
    Mazur JE; Coe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 3612019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Animal procrastination: Pigeons choose to defer experiencing an aversive gap or a peck requirement.
    Zentall TR; Peng D; House D; Halloran M
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 31845110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.
    Mazur JE; Vaughan W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 3681185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.