These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8587300)

  • 41. Evaluating and defining the sharpness of intraocular lenses: microedge structure of commercially available square-edged hydrophilic intraocular lenses.
    Werner L; Tetz M; Feldmann I; Bücker M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):556-66. PubMed ID: 19251151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Reasons for the explantation of posterior chamber lenses].
    Auffarth GU; Wesendahl TA; Brown SJ; Apple DJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Aug; 91(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 7950124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Long-term results of implantation of a plate haptic silicone lens in the capsular sac].
    Zehetmayer M; Skorpik C; Weghaupt H; Pfleger T; Scholz U
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Apr; 204(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 8022151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of optic edge design, optic material, and haptic design on capsular bend configuration.
    Sacu S; Findl O; Menapace R; Buehl W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1888-94. PubMed ID: 16338556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scanning electron microscopic characteristics of commercially available 1- and 3-piece intraocular lenses.
    Brockmann T; Brockmann C; Nietzsche S; Bertelmann E; Strobel J; Dawczynski J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1893-9. PubMed ID: 24427797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation. Results of the 2000 and 2001 survey in Germany].
    Dick HB; Tehrani M; Brauweiler P; Haefliger E; Neuhann T; Scharrer A
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 12820014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses.
    Lane SS; Burgi P; Milios GS; Orchowski MW; Vaughan M; Schwarte E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2397-402. PubMed ID: 15519095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Subluxation of suture-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses a clinicopathologic study.
    Parekh P; Green WR; Stark WJ; Akpek EK
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 17270672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of foldable acrylic and hydrogel intraocular lenses.
    Kohnen T; Magdowski G; Koch DD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22 Suppl 2():1342-50. PubMed ID: 9051527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Scanning electron microscopic characteristics of phakic intraocular lenses.
    Kohnen T; Baumeister M; Magdowski G
    Ophthalmology; 2000 May; 107(5):934-9. PubMed ID: 10811086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Acrylic intraocular lens damage after folding using a forceps insertion technique.
    Erie JC; Newman B; Mahr MA; Khan AR; McIntosh M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 20202549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Scanning electron microscopy study of different one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses after injection through microincisional cataract surgery cartridges.
    Cecchini P; D'Aloisio R; De Giacinto C; Turco G; Tognetto D
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):369-376. PubMed ID: 31624987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of 100 explanted one-piece and three-piece silicone intraocular lenses.
    Auffarth GU; Wilcox M; Sims JC; McCabe C; Wesendahl TA; Apple DJ
    Ophthalmology; 1995 Aug; 102(8):1144-50. PubMed ID: 9097739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.
    Schmidbauer JM; Peng Q; Apple DJ; Pandey SK; Escobar-Gomez M; Auffarth GU; Werner L; Vargas LG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1223-8. PubMed ID: 12106732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Low-vacuum, low-voltage scanning electron microscopy of poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses.
    Hayashi H; Oshima K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Mar; 24(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 9559476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Experimental study of spherical aberrations of intraocular lenses with different materials and designs].
    Yang RB; Tang X; Yuan JQ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 43(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 18001564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Experimental and clinical evaluation of incision size and shape following forceps and injector implantation of a three-piece high-refractive-index silicone intraocular lens.
    Kohnen T; Koch DD
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Dec; 236(12):922-8. PubMed ID: 9865623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Complication profiles of posterior chamber intraocular lenses IOL). An analysis of 586 foldable and 2077 rigid explanted intraocular lenses].
    Schmidbauer JM; Apple DJ; Auffarth GU; Peng Q; Pandey SK; Werner L; Escobar-Gomez M; Vargas LG
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Nov; 98(11):1029-35. PubMed ID: 11729733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Incision sizes for foldable intraocular lenses.
    Kohnen T; Lambert RJ; Koch DD
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Aug; 104(8):1277-86. PubMed ID: 9261314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Optic surface changes in Intraocular lens scaffold: An ex vivo study.
    Kumar DA; Agarwal A; Panneerselvam D; Gnanaprakasam JS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 254(7):1319-24. PubMed ID: 27236574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.