These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8587528)

  • 1. Calorimetric determination of the absorbed dose-to-water beam quality correction factor kQ for high-energy photon beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1749-52. PubMed ID: 8587528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calorimetric determination of kQ factors for NE 2561 and NE 2571 ionization chambers in 5 cm x 5 cm and 10 cm x 10 cm radiotherapy beams of 8 MV and 16 MV photons.
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6243-59. PubMed ID: 17921583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
    Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental determination of kQ factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in 10 cm × 10 cm and 3 cm × 3 cm photon beams from 4 MV to 25 MV.
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4227-46. PubMed ID: 25017482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct measurement of electron beam quality conversion factors using water calorimetry.
    Renaud J; Sarfehnia A; Marchant K; McEwen M; Ross C; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6357-68. PubMed ID: 26520727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aerrow: A probe-format graphite calorimeter for absolute dosimetry of high-energy photon beams in the clinical environment.
    Renaud J; Sarfehnia A; Bancheri J; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):414-428. PubMed ID: 29131344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of electron contamination on in vivo surface dosimetry for high-energy photon beams.
    Sjögren R; Karlsson M
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 9650182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorbed dose beam quality correction factors kappaQ for the NE2571 chamber in a 5 MV and a 10 MV photon beam.
    Palmans H; Mondelaers W; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Mar; 44(3):647-63. PubMed ID: 10211800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental and Monte-Carlo characterization of the novel compact ionization chamber PTW 31023 for reference and relative dosimetry in high energy photon beams.
    Büsing I; Brant A; Lange T; Delfs B; Poppinga D; Kranzer R; Looe HK; Poppe B
    Z Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 29(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 30878324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo and water calorimetric determination of kilovoltage beam radiotherapy ionization chamber correction factors.
    Bancheri J; Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(10):105001. PubMed ID: 32208370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. White polystyrene as a substitute for water in high energy photon dosimetry.
    Christ G
    Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):2097-100. PubMed ID: 8746716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct absorbed dose to water determination based on water calorimetry in scanning proton beam delivery.
    Sarfehnia A; Clasie B; Chung E; Lu HM; Flanz J; Cascio E; Engelsman M; Paganetti H; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3541-50. PubMed ID: 20831061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
    Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
    Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A small-body portable graphite calorimeter for dosimetry in low-energy clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Thomas R; Simon M; Duane S; Kacperek A; DuSautoy A; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3737-49. PubMed ID: 15446802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.