These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8587528)

  • 21. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
    González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Photon beam skin dose analyses for different clinical setups.
    Kim S; Liu CR; Zhu TC; Palta JR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):860-6. PubMed ID: 9650173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121722. PubMed ID: 24320508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dosimetric characterization of radiosurgical beams with a diamond detector.
    Rustgi SN; Frye DM
    Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):2117-21. PubMed ID: 8746721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison between calculated and experimental kQ photon beam quality correction factors.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):L25-38. PubMed ID: 11008946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An absolute dose determination of helical tomotherapy accelerator, TomoTherapy High-Art II.
    Bailat CJ; Buchillier T; Pachoud M; Moeckli R; Bochud FO
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3891-6. PubMed ID: 19810461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct determination of k
    Osinga-Blättermann JM; Brons S; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Krauss A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2033-2054. PubMed ID: 28212111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reference dosimetry for light-ion beams based on graphite calorimetry.
    Rossomme S; Palmans H; Thomas R; Lee N; Duane S; Bailey M; Shipley D; Bertrand D; Romano F; Cirrone P; Cuttone G; Vynckier S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):92-5. PubMed ID: 24336190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spectral reconstruction of clinical megavoltage photon beams and the implications of spectral determination on the dosimetry of such beams.
    Nisbet A; Weatherburn H; Fenwick JD; McVey G
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1507-21. PubMed ID: 9651021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of the BIPM calorimetric and ionometric standards in megavoltage photon beams to determine Wair and Ic.
    Burns DT; Picard S; Kessler C; Roger P
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1353-65. PubMed ID: 24583932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of cylindrical ionization chambers for high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huang Y; Willomitzer C; Zakaria GA; Hartmann GH
    Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 19926506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling the extrafocal radiation and monitor chamber backscatter for photon beam dose calculation.
    Jiang SB; Boyer AL; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 11213923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental determination of the beam quality dependence factors, kQ, for ionization chambers used in photon and electron dosimetry.
    Guerra AS; Laitano RF; Pimpinella M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1177-90. PubMed ID: 7568376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Absorbed-dose calibrations in high-energy photon beams at the National Physical Laboratory: conversion procedure.
    Burns JE
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1555-75. PubMed ID: 15551531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct calibration in megavoltage photon beams using Monte Carlo conversion factor: validation and clinical implications.
    Wright T; Lye JE; Ramanathan G; Harty PD; Oliver C; Webb DV; Butler DJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):883-904. PubMed ID: 25565406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of ionization chamber correction factors in photon beams using a time saving strategy with PENELOPE code.
    Reis CQ; Nicolucci P
    Phys Med; 2016 Feb; 32(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 26873785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors.
    Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1227-39. PubMed ID: 1435604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling transmission and scatter for photon beam attenuators.
    Ahnesjö A; Weber L; Nilsson P
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1711-20. PubMed ID: 8587523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implementation of water calorimetry in a 180 MeV scanned pulsed proton beam including an experimental determination of kQ for a Farmer chamber.
    Medin J
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3287-98. PubMed ID: 20484778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.