283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8587778)
1. Correlations between subjective sensation of nasal patency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total nasal assessment.
Sipilä J; Suonpää J; Silvoniemi P; Laippala P
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1995; 57(5):260-3. PubMed ID: 8587778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation.
Jones AS; Willatt DJ; Durham LM
J Laryngol Otol; 1989 Oct; 103(10):909-11. PubMed ID: 2584850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of nasal patency: comparison of patient and clinician assessments with rhinomanometry.
Panagou P; Loukides S; Tsipra S; Syrigou K; Anastasakis C; Kalogeropoulos N
Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Nov; 118(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 9870632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensation of nasal obstruction compared to rhinomanometric results in patients referred for septoplasty.
Sipilä J; Suonpää J; Laippala P
Rhinology; 1994 Sep; 32(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 7839086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How good are patients at determining which side of the nose is more obstructed? A study on the limits of discrimination of the subjective assessment of unilateral nasal obstruction.
Clarke JD; Hopkins ML; Eccles R
Am J Rhinol; 2006; 20(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16539289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty.
Tompos T; Garai T; Zemplén B; Gerlinger I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 267(12):1887-91. PubMed ID: 20544355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective one-year follow-up cohort study.
Hsu HC; Tan CD; Chang CW; Chu CW; Chiu YC; Pan CJ; Huang HM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 42(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27102375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensation of nasal airflow compared with nasal airway resistance in patients with rhinitis.
Simola M; Malmberg H
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1997 Jun; 22(3):260-2. PubMed ID: 9222633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of side difference in nasal obstruction and rhinomanometry: a retrospective correlation of symptoms and rhinomanometry in 1000 patients.
Thulesius HL; Cervin A; Jessen M
Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 37(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22136145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR)--basics and practice 2010.
Vogt K; Jalowayski AA; Althaus W; Cao C; Han D; Hasse W; Hoffrichter H; Mösges R; Pallanch J; Shah-Hosseini K; Peksis K; Wernecke KD; Zhang L; Zaporoshenko P
Rhinol Suppl; 2010; 21():1-50. PubMed ID: 20649107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.
Kim CS; Moon BK; Jung DH; Min YG
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Jan; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 9512794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of nasal response following different treatment regimes of oxymetazoline with reference to rebound congestion.
Morris S; Eccles R; Martez SJ; Riker DK; Witek TJ
Am J Rhinol; 1997; 11(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9129752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective assessment of nasal resistance in patients with nasal disease.
Suzina AH; Hamzah M; Samsudin AR
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Aug; 117(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 12956914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rhinomanometry Versus Computational Fluid Dynamics: Correlated, but Different Techniques.
Cherobin GB; Voegels RL; Pinna FR; Gebrim EMMS; Bailey RS; Garcia GJM
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2021 Mar; 35(2):245-255. PubMed ID: 32806938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nasal airway resistance after decongestion with a nasal spray or a bellows device.
Jessen M; Ivarsson A; Malm L
Rhinology; 1996 Mar; 34(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 8739865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the sensation of nasal obstruction with acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.
Tai CF; Ho KY; Hasegawa M
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 1998 Sep; 14(9):548-53. PubMed ID: 9796198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between Objective and Subjective Assessment of Nasal Patency.
Mozzanica F; Gera R; Bulgheroni C; Ambrogi F; Schindler A; Ottaviani F
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Sep; 28(88):313-319. PubMed ID: 27738607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of nasal obstruction with rhinomanometry and subjective scales and outcomes of surgical and medical treatment.
Lara-Sánchez H; Álvarez Nuño C; Gil-Carcedo Sañudo E; Mayo Iscar A; Vallejo Valdezate LÁ
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017; 68(3):145-150. PubMed ID: 27780551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rhinomanometry: an update.
Hirschberg A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2002; 64(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 12232472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between objective and subjective assessments of nasal patency.
Hirschberg A; Rezek O
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1998; 60(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 9646308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
