These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8587778)

  • 1. Correlations between subjective sensation of nasal patency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total nasal assessment.
    Sipilä J; Suonpää J; Silvoniemi P; Laippala P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1995; 57(5):260-3. PubMed ID: 8587778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation.
    Jones AS; Willatt DJ; Durham LM
    J Laryngol Otol; 1989 Oct; 103(10):909-11. PubMed ID: 2584850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of nasal patency: comparison of patient and clinician assessments with rhinomanometry.
    Panagou P; Loukides S; Tsipra S; Syrigou K; Anastasakis C; Kalogeropoulos N
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Nov; 118(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 9870632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensation of nasal obstruction compared to rhinomanometric results in patients referred for septoplasty.
    Sipilä J; Suonpää J; Laippala P
    Rhinology; 1994 Sep; 32(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 7839086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How good are patients at determining which side of the nose is more obstructed? A study on the limits of discrimination of the subjective assessment of unilateral nasal obstruction.
    Clarke JD; Hopkins ML; Eccles R
    Am J Rhinol; 2006; 20(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16539289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty.
    Tompos T; Garai T; Zemplén B; Gerlinger I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 267(12):1887-91. PubMed ID: 20544355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective one-year follow-up cohort study.
    Hsu HC; Tan CD; Chang CW; Chu CW; Chiu YC; Pan CJ; Huang HM
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 42(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27102375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensation of nasal airflow compared with nasal airway resistance in patients with rhinitis.
    Simola M; Malmberg H
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1997 Jun; 22(3):260-2. PubMed ID: 9222633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of side difference in nasal obstruction and rhinomanometry: a retrospective correlation of symptoms and rhinomanometry in 1000 patients.
    Thulesius HL; Cervin A; Jessen M
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 37(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22136145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR)--basics and practice 2010.
    Vogt K; Jalowayski AA; Althaus W; Cao C; Han D; Hasse W; Hoffrichter H; Mösges R; Pallanch J; Shah-Hosseini K; Peksis K; Wernecke KD; Zhang L; Zaporoshenko P
    Rhinol Suppl; 2010; 21():1-50. PubMed ID: 20649107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.
    Kim CS; Moon BK; Jung DH; Min YG
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Jan; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 9512794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of nasal response following different treatment regimes of oxymetazoline with reference to rebound congestion.
    Morris S; Eccles R; Martez SJ; Riker DK; Witek TJ
    Am J Rhinol; 1997; 11(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9129752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective assessment of nasal resistance in patients with nasal disease.
    Suzina AH; Hamzah M; Samsudin AR
    J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Aug; 117(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 12956914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhinomanometry Versus Computational Fluid Dynamics: Correlated, but Different Techniques.
    Cherobin GB; Voegels RL; Pinna FR; Gebrim EMMS; Bailey RS; Garcia GJM
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2021 Mar; 35(2):245-255. PubMed ID: 32806938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nasal airway resistance after decongestion with a nasal spray or a bellows device.
    Jessen M; Ivarsson A; Malm L
    Rhinology; 1996 Mar; 34(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 8739865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the sensation of nasal obstruction with acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.
    Tai CF; Ho KY; Hasegawa M
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 1998 Sep; 14(9):548-53. PubMed ID: 9796198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between Objective and Subjective Assessment of Nasal Patency.
    Mozzanica F; Gera R; Bulgheroni C; Ambrogi F; Schindler A; Ottaviani F
    Iran J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Sep; 28(88):313-319. PubMed ID: 27738607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of nasal obstruction with rhinomanometry and subjective scales and outcomes of surgical and medical treatment.
    Lara-Sánchez H; Álvarez Nuño C; Gil-Carcedo Sañudo E; Mayo Iscar A; Vallejo Valdezate LÁ
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017; 68(3):145-150. PubMed ID: 27780551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rhinomanometry: an update.
    Hirschberg A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2002; 64(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 12232472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between objective and subjective assessments of nasal patency.
    Hirschberg A; Rezek O
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1998; 60(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 9646308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.