BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

20 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8588020)

  • 1. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
    Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage.
    Tate KM; Strickland JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):715-7. PubMed ID: 9351750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endocervical sampling in women with suspected cervical neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Damkjær M; Laursen JB; Petersen LK; Schledermann D; Booth BB; Dolleris BB; Laursen HS; Schroll JB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 227(6):839-848.e4. PubMed ID: 35934116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review.
    Mitric C; Lakabi R; Kligun G; Matanes E; Lau S; Gotlieb WH; Salvador S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2162866. PubMed ID: 36689210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of the patient with an abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Iliya FA; Yazigi R
    Tex Med; 1992 Aug; 88(8):63-7. PubMed ID: 1440429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 1.