These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8588673)

  • 1. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP; Green WB
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 8588673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of subtle mid-frequency auditory dysfunction upon speech discrimination in noise.
    Findlay RC; Denenberg LJ
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: contribution of temporal resolution defect.
    Phillips DP; Rappaport JM; Gulliver JM
    Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 8572072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
    Rance G; Barker E; Mok M; Dowell R; Rincon A; Garratt R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of list equivalency of the northwestern university auditory test no. 6 in interrupted broadband noise.
    Stuart A
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15248801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition abilities in noise for children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing impairment.
    Ruscetta MN; Arjmand EM; Pratt SR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 15885329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.