These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8588673)

  • 21. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Giguere C; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2030537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 511652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The quantitative effects of competition on verbal intelligibility in the elderly].
    Prosser S; Orzan E; Miani C
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1993; 13(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8256616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP
    Ear Hear; 1996 Dec; 17(6):478-89. PubMed ID: 8979036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of alcohol on central auditory processing (comparison with marihuana).
    Fitzpatrick D; Eviatar A
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Jun; 9(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 7431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interactive effects of low-pass filtering and masking noise on word recognition.
    Scott T; Green WB; Stuart A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Oct; 12(9):437-44. PubMed ID: 11699814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.
    Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of normal and impaired hearing. II. Frequency analysis, speech perception.
    Scharf B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):81-106. PubMed ID: 292155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Intelligibility of monosyllables in relation to tone hearing in noise-induced hearing loss].
    Tymnik G; Stange E; Lessing G; Zobelt U
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Jun; 66(6):335-7. PubMed ID: 3626717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance-intensity functions of Mandarin word recognition tests in noise: test dialect and listener language effects.
    Liu D; Shi LF
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23800810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of high-pass and of low-pass filtering upon the intelligibility of speech in white noise.
    Niederjohn RJ; Mliner DG
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jul; 22(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 7187668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of auditory temporal resolution between monolingual Persian and bilingual Turkish-Persian individuals.
    Omidvar S; Jafari Z; Tahaei AA; Salehi M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 23398178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.
    Horwitz AR; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 11831814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation norms for speech discrimination scores of normal-hearing subjects in wide-band and in speech-spectrum noise at S/N 0 DB.
    Doyle KJ; Rupp RR
    J Aud Res; 1977 Oct; 17(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 617815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word recognition in continuous noise, interrupted noise, and in quiet by normal-hearing listeners at two sensation levels.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 9187004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.