These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8588676)

  • 1. Consonant perception by users of Nucleus and Clarion multichannel cochlear implants.
    Doyle KJ; Mills D; Larky J; Kessler D; Luxford WM; Schindler RA
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 8588676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Clarion cochlear implant--technical principles, initial clinical experiences and results].
    Lenarz T; Battmer RD
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8851112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New processing strategies in cochlear implantation.
    Wilson BS; Lawson DT; Zerbi M; Finley CC; Wolford RD
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 8588675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of different synthesis signals in acoustic models of cochlear implants.
    Strydom T; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):920-33. PubMed ID: 21361449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy.
    Verschuur C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1723-36. PubMed ID: 19275329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory/visual speech perception by cochlear implant users and hearing aid wearers.
    Danhauer JL; Erratt JD; Edgerton BJ
    Am J Otol; 1986 Sep; 7(5):354-60. PubMed ID: 3789122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J; Core C; Larsen MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in consonant cluster production by pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Chin SB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):7S-10S. PubMed ID: 17496637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
    Rouger J; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Sep; 102(9):1006-13. PubMed ID: 1518346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.
    Tye-Murray N; Tyler RS
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 2792582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluations of 3M/House single-channel and nucleus multichannel cochlear implants.
    Cunningham JK; Stoeckert JA
    Am J Otol; 1992 Sep; 13(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 1443081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.