These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8589223)

  • 1. Testing familial aggregation.
    Houwing-Duistermaat JJ; Derkx BH; Rosendaal FR; van Houwelingen HC
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1292-301. PubMed ID: 8589223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new test statistic for linkage applied to bipolar disorder and marker D18S41.
    Cleves MA; Dawson DV; Elston RC; Schnell AH
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 9433546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Score statistic to test for genetic correlation for proband-family design.
    el Galta R; van Duijn CM; van Houwelingen JC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Jul; 69(Pt 4):373-81. PubMed ID: 15996166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Score tests for familial correlation in genotyped-proband designs.
    Carroll RJ; Gail MH; Benichou J; Pee D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 10797590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Score tests for epistasis models on quantitative traits using general pedigree data.
    Wang K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 25(4):314-26. PubMed ID: 14639701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
    Ray A; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of quantitative trait loci using hybrid pedigrees: quantitative traits of animals].
    Svishcheva GR
    Genetika; 2007 Feb; 43(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 17385327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A score test for linkage analysis of ordinal traits based on IBD sharing.
    Feng R; Zhang H
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jan; 9(1):114-27. PubMed ID: 17519391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Estimation of allele frequencies using pedigree samples].
    Ginzburg EKh; Aksenovich TI
    Genetika; 1996 Jan; 32(1):120-7. PubMed ID: 8647414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditional likelihood score functions for mixed models in linkage analysis.
    Hössjer O
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):313-32. PubMed ID: 15772109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analytic power calculation for QTL linkage analysis of small pedigrees.
    Rijsdijk FV; Hewitt JK; Sham PC
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 9(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 11378821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the HLA system.
    Eguchi S; Matsuura M
    Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 2364131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferential testing for linkage with GENEHUNTER-MODSCORE: the impact of the pedigree structure on the null distribution of multipoint MOD scores.
    Mattheisen M; Dietter J; Knapp M; Baur MP; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 17849490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving estimates of genetic maps: a maximum likelihood approach.
    Stewart WC; Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 16984314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic control for association studies under various genetic models.
    Zheng G; Freidlin B; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 15737092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hierarchical model for estimating significance levels of non-parametric linkage statistics for large pedigrees.
    Brock GN; Weeks DE; Sobel E; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):417-30. PubMed ID: 17508354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust approach to t linear mixed models applied to multiple sclerosis data.
    Lin TI; Lee JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1397-412. PubMed ID: 16220509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.