These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8590510)

  • 1. Optimal stimulating current for train-of-four stimulation in conscious subjects.
    Saitoh Y; Nakazawa K; Toyooka H; Amaha K
    Can J Anaesth; 1995 Nov; 42(11):992-5. PubMed ID: 8590510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified double burst stimulation of varying stimulating currents.
    Saitoh Y; Fujii Y; Makita K; Tanaka H; Amaha K
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1998 Aug; 42(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 9698964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelographic train-of-four at near-threshold currents.
    Silverman DG; Connelly NR; O'Connor TZ; Garcia R; Brull SJ
    Anesthesiology; 1992 Jan; 76(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 1729934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs and train-of-four fade.
    McCoy EP; Connolly FM; Mirakhur RK; Loan PB; Paxton LD
    Can J Anaesth; 1995 Mar; 42(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 7743572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of double-burst monitoring at 10 mA above threshold current.
    Silverman DG; Brull SJ
    Can J Anaesth; 1993 Jun; 40(6):502-6. PubMed ID: 8104723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceleromyography improves detection of residual neuromuscular blockade in children.
    Ansermino JM; Sanderson PM; Bevan JC; Bevan DR
    Can J Anaesth; 1996 Jun; 43(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 8773866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of dynamic and isometric force sensors for train-of-four measurement using submaximal stimulation current.
    Kern SE; Johnson JO; Westenskow DR; Orr JA
    J Clin Monit; 1995 Jan; 11(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 7745448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of the potency of ORG 9426 using two different modes of nerve stimulation.
    Cooper RA; Mirakhur RK; Elliott P; McCarthy GJ
    Can J Anaesth; 1992 Feb; 39(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 1531945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of train-of-four monitoring at varying stimulating currents.
    Helbo-Hansen HS; Bang U; Nielsen HK; Skovgaard LT
    Anesthesiology; 1992 Feb; 76(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 1736696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real time versus slow-motion train-of-four monitoring: a theory to explain the inaccuracy of visual assessment.
    Brull SJ; Silverman DG
    Anesth Analg; 1995 Mar; 80(3):548-51. PubMed ID: 7864423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulation with submaximal current for train-of-four monitoring.
    Brull SJ; Ehrenwerth J; Silverman DG
    Anesthesiology; 1990 Apr; 72(4):629-32. PubMed ID: 2321779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective responses to train-of-four and double burst stimulation in awake patients.
    Connelly NR; Silverman DG; O'Connor TZ; Brull SJ
    Anesth Analg; 1990 Jun; 70(6):650-3. PubMed ID: 2160781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of train-of-four and double burst stimulation ratios at varying amperages.
    Brull SJ; Connelly NR; Silverman DG
    Anesth Analg; 1990 Nov; 71(5):489-92. PubMed ID: 2171383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal surface electrode positioning for reliable train of four muscle relaxation monitoring.
    Smans J; Korsten HH; Blom JA
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1996 Feb; 13(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 8847473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of residual curarization using low-current stimulation.
    Brull SJ; Ehrenwerth J; Connelly NR; Silverman DG
    Can J Anaesth; 1991 Mar; 38(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 1673643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double burst stimulation with submaximal current.
    Ueda N; Masuda Y; Muteki T; Harada H; Tsuda H; Tobata H
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 7988585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method of intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular function and residual blockade in the recovery room.
    Jones KA; Lennon RL; Hosking MP
    Minn Med; 1992 Jul; 75(7):23-6. PubMed ID: 1357537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuromuscular monitoring: does it make a difference?
    Martin R; Bourdua I; Thériault S; Tétrault JP; Pilote M
    Can J Anaesth; 1996 Jun; 43(6):585-8. PubMed ID: 8773865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of tactile and mechanomyographical assessment of response to double burst and train-of-four stimulation during moderate and profound neuromuscular blockade.
    Kirkegaard-Nielsen H; Helbo-Hansen HS; Severinsen IK; Lindholm P; Pedersen HS; Schmidt MB
    Can J Anaesth; 1995 Jan; 42(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7889580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-tetanic burst: a new monitoring method for intense neuromuscular block.
    Saitoh Y; Toyooka H; Amaha K
    Br J Anaesth; 1995 Mar; 74(3):293-5. PubMed ID: 7718374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.