129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8591310)
1. Quantitative coronary arteriography: efficient correction of catheter calibrated vessel measurement.
Fischer F; Wunderlich W; Noring J; Linderer T
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():724. PubMed ID: 8591310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.
Wunderlich W; Roehrig B; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Agrawal R; Morguet A; Schultheiss HP; Horstkotte D
Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Aug; 14(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 9934610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of calibration errors on the accuracy of vessel dimensions in routine quantitative coronary arteriography.
Wunderlich W; Röhrig B; Fischer F; Linderer T
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():725. PubMed ID: 8591311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography.
Fortin DF; Spero LA; Cusma JT; Santoro L; Burgess R; Bashore TM
Am J Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 68(11):1176-82. PubMed ID: 1951077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of three-dimensional angiographic data obtained by self-calibration of multiview imaging.
Noël PB; Hoffmann KR; Kasodekar S; Walczak AM; Schafer S
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3901-11. PubMed ID: 17089852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved determination of biplane imaging geometry from two projection images and its application to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial trees.
Chen SY; Metz CE
Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):633-54. PubMed ID: 9167155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of catheters and metallic catheter markers as calibration standard for measurement of coronary dimension.
Leung WH; Demopulos PA; Alderman EL; Sanders W; Stadius ML
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Nov; 21(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 2225049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traceable micro-CT scaling accuracy phantom for applications requiring exact measurement of distances or volumes.
Waring CS; Bax JS; Samarabandu A; Holdsworth DW; Fenster A; Lacefield JC
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6022-7. PubMed ID: 23039640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Size estimation and magnification error in radiographic imaging: implications for classification of arteriovenous malformations.
Elisevich K; Cunningham IA; Assis L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Mar; 16(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 7793378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system.
Tomkowiak MT; Speidel MA; Raval AN; Van Lysel MS
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):283-93. PubMed ID: 21361197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of vessel orientation on videodensitometry quantitative coronary arteriography.
Molloi S; Dang Q; Breault J
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2862-8. PubMed ID: 14655932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological quality of coronary guiding catheters: a quantitative analysis.
Herrman JR; Keane D; Ozaki Y; den Boer A; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Sep; 33(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8001104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analytic isocenter calibration. A new approach for accurate x-ray gantries.
Wunderlich W; Fischer F; Linderer T; Kirkeeide RL
Angiology; 1995 Jul; 46(7):577-82. PubMed ID: 7618760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calibration with currently available low-radiopacity catheters for scaling in digital quantitative coronary angiography.
Tadehara F; Imazu M; Kono S; Sano K
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):705-12. PubMed ID: 11753141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography.
Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 10731406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction.
Zeintl J; Vija AH; Yahil A; Hornegger J; Kuwert T
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):921-8. PubMed ID: 20484423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive approach to accurate analysis of small-diameter vessels in cineangiograms.
Sonka M; Reddy GK; Winniford MD; Collins SM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Feb; 16(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 9050411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative coronary angiography: impact of imaging parameters on accuracy and confidence interval.
Seissl H; Peukert K; Geiger B; Verstraelen BJ
Heart Vessels; 1997; Suppl 12():212-6. PubMed ID: 9476586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions.
Bell MR; Britson PJ; Chu A; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Schwartz RS
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Jan; 40(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 8993818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
