These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8593220)

  • 1. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems.
    Erickson RL; Glasspoole EA
    J Esthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):227-44. PubMed ID: 8593220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage in three designs of glass ionomer under composite resin restorations.
    Gordon M; Wasserstein A; Gorfil C; Imber S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Mar; 18(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 2037937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glass-ionomer bases under posterior composites.
    Davidson CL
    J Esthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):223-4. PubMed ID: 8593219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of glass ionomer liners on bonding strength of laminate veneers.
    Kedici PS; Kalipcilar B; Bilir OG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 1403914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique.
    Suzuki M; Jordan RE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 2404044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation to the cavity floor of the light-cured glass ionomer cement base under a composite restoration.
    Hotta M; Aono M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1994 Nov; 21(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 7830203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.
    Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8814631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.