These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8593220)

  • 21. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite.
    de Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Medeiros e Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Pontual ML; Montes MA
    J Dent; 2011 Jan; 39(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20888884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations with glass ionomer liners in vitro.
    Mathis RS; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 2338665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of open-sandwich vs. adhesive restorative techniques on enamel and dentine demineralization: an in situ study.
    Kirsten GA; Rached RN; Mazur RF; Vieira S; Souza EM
    J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):872-80. PubMed ID: 23851134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 11823011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.
    Rojpaibool T; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
    Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation.
    Burgess J; Norling B; Summitt J
    J Esthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):207-15. PubMed ID: 8593217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of restorative materials on the adaptation of two bases and a dentin bonding agent to internal cavity walls.
    McConnell RJ; Boksman L; Hunter JK; Gratton DR
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Nov; 17(11):703-10. PubMed ID: 3538115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Mar; 19(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 1517872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials.
    Burgess JO; Barghi N; Chan DC; Hummert T
    Am J Dent; 1993 Jun; 6(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 8240775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage of high-strength glass ionomer: resin composite restorations in minimally invasive treatment.
    Platt JA; Rhodes B
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2001-2002 Winter; 80(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 12061017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.