These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8593903)

  • 1. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of thin K-edge filters on radiation dose in dental radiography.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):990-5. PubMed ID: 1450837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reduction in radiation dose for intra-oral radiographs by the use of thin K-edge filters.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):524-8. PubMed ID: 2070183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Niobi-X filtration in intraoral radiology.
    White SC; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Dec; 72(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 1812457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
    Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Are additional filters made of niobium superior to the copper filter in dental radiology?].
    Cordt I; Engelke W
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(10):1160-3. PubMed ID: 2237349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of E-speed film with added filtration.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Underhill TE; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 3458135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 1: Subjective assessment and contrast.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Nov; 20(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 1808011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast.
    Gonçalves A; Rollo JM; Gonçalves M; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15798826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rare earth filters for intraoral radiography: exposure reduction as a function of kV(p) with comparisons of image quality.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 May; 118(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 2715547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
    Price C; McDonnell D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental radiographic diagnostic resolution with minimal exposure.
    Klein AI; Campbell E; Yim P; Synenberg W
    Pediatr Dent; 1985 Mar; 7(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3857560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.