These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8593908)

  • 1. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs.
    Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Groenhuis RA
    J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 6379007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardized lateral oblique projection of the mandible for digital subtraction radiography.
    Araki K; Kitamori H; Yoshiura K; Okuda H; Ohki M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 1397463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Registration of dental radiographs using projective geometry.
    Ostuni J; Fisher E; van der Stelt P; Dunn S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 8181647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Kiliç AR; Efeoglu E; Yilmaz S
    Periodontal Clin Investig; 1996; 18(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 9116467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography.
    Mol A; Dunn SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Sep; 96(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 12973297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.
    Reddy MS
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1078-84. PubMed ID: 1479529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images.
    Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modern radiographic methods in the diagnosis of periodontal disease.
    Van der Stelt PF
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 8260003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Intraoral radiographs of dental implants in the edentulous mandible].
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jul; 102(7):258-62. PubMed ID: 11837109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl HG; Benn DK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 11114663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital image processing. I. Evaluation of gray level correction methods in vitro.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 8038343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Byrd V; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 9574960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.
    Samarabandu J; Allen K; Hausmann E; Acharya R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 7835503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.