These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Adaptive psychophysical procedures, loss functions, and entropy. Kelareva E; Mewing J; Turpin A; Wirth A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):2003-12. PubMed ID: 20952796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures motivated by the theory of optimal experiments: simulated and experimental results. Remus JJ; Collins LM J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):315-26. PubMed ID: 18177161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking of nociceptive thresholds using adaptive psychophysical methods. Doll RJ; Buitenweg JR; Meijer HG; Veltink PH Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 23835651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the threshold of pulse-train electrical stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise. Xu Y; Collins LM IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 15072213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution. Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Shackelford J; Rogers CL Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 17182878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures. Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207217. PubMed ID: 30485350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the ASA, MOBS, and ZEST threshold methods. Anderson AJ; Johnson CA Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2403-11. PubMed ID: 16516258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Algorithm for improving psychophysical threshold estimates by detecting sustained inattention in experiments using PEST. Rinderknecht MD; Ranzani R; Popp WL; Lambercy O; Gassert R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1629-1645. PubMed ID: 29748784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function. García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):147-74. PubMed ID: 17535585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function. King-Smith PE; Rose D Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(12):1595-604. PubMed ID: 9231226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast adaptive estimation of multidimensional psychometric functions. DiMattina C J Vis; 2015; 15(9):5. PubMed ID: 26200886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Klein SA Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model Based or Model Free? Comparing Adaptive Methods for Estimating Thresholds in Neuroscience. Audiffren J; Bresciani JP Neural Comput; 2022 Jan; 34(2):338-359. PubMed ID: 34915578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Strasburger H Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1348-55. PubMed ID: 11800461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data. Kaernbach C Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]