These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8595100)

  • 1. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):421-33. PubMed ID: 8595100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of torque (moment) on implant/prosthesis with staggered buccal and lingual offset.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):252-65. PubMed ID: 9084311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
    Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The spline implant: design, engineering, and evaluation.
    Binon PP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):419-33. PubMed ID: 9108742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants.
    Jörnéus L; Jemt T; Carlsson L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 1289261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
    Drago CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part I. The effects of tightening the gold screws and placement of a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 8603168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical clinical guidelines to prevent screw loosening.
    Hurson S
    Int J Dent Symp; 1995; 3(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9117862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws.
    Sakaguchi RL; Borgersen SE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 7615325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part 2. The effects of loading a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9171008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
    Binon PP; McHugh MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection.
    Merz BR; Hunenbart S; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 10960985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.