109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8595110)
1. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy.
Millington ND; Leung T
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 8595110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part II: Efficacy of the Preci-disc system for the correction of errors.
Uludamar A; Leung T
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 8630173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part I. The effects of tightening the gold screws and placement of a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 8603168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part 2. The effects of loading a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9171008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.
al-Turki LE; Chai J; Lautenschlager EP; Hutten MC
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11887597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures.
Cheshire PD; Hobkirk JA
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 23(11):782-9. PubMed ID: 8953484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
Binon PP; McHugh MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
Drago CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
Haack JE; Sakaguchi RL; Sun T; Coffey JP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
Duyck J; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An experimental analysis of the stresses on the implant in an implant-tooth-supported prosthesis: a technical note.
Uysal H; Iplikçioğlu H; Avci M; Gündüz Bilir O; Kural O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 9048464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
