BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8595116)

  • 1. Pressure distribution using tissue conditioners on simplified edentulous ridge models. Part 2: The influence of the powder particle size and ethanol content.
    Shigeto N; Hamada T; Iwanaga H; Murata H
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 8595116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure distribution using tissue conditioners on simplified edentulous ridge models. Part 1: The influence of the height of the residual ridge.
    Shigeto N; Hamada T; Iwanaga H; Murata H
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):490-5. PubMed ID: 8595108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness of dental stone and improved dental stone.
    Panagiotouni E; Pissiotis A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7920395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic functional impression technique for severely resorbed alveolar ridges.
    Batista AU; Carreiro Ada F; Souza AA; Filho JN; de Almeida EO
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Dec; 19(4):160-2. PubMed ID: 22645801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified fluid wax impression for a severely resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge.
    Tan KM; Singer MT; Masri R; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 19328281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of tissue conditioners on the dynamic viscoelastic properties of a heat-polymerized denture base.
    Murata H; Toki K; Hong G; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 12447218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical procedures in precision attachment removable partial denture construction.
    Kotowicz WE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jan; 24(1):143-64. PubMed ID: 6987102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of tissue conditioning materials.
    Pissiotis A; Panagiotouni E; Sofou A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Dec; 3(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 8605503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two new tissue conditioners and their ability to reproduce undercuts.
    Rantanen T; Lindholm K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1973 Jun; 69(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 4586573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
    Stillwell KD
    Todays FDA; 2009 Aug; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shrinkage of tissue conditioners with time--effect of the particle size in powder and the EtOH content in liquid.
    Murakami S; Murata H; Sadamori S; Shigeto N; Hamada T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 1453262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials.
    Chander S; Hill M; Moore D; Morrow L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 17645067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of edentulism: optimizing outcomes with tissue management and impression techniques.
    Salinas TJ
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 19254298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of mandibular residual ridge shape on masticatory efficiency in complete denture wearers.
    Koshino H; Hirai T; Ishijima T; Ohtomo K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 12066494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-over Randomised Controlled Trial of selective pressure impressions for lower complete dentures.
    Hyde TP; Craddock HL; Blance A; Brunton PA
    J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):853-8. PubMed ID: 20637826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of the flabby ridge: using contemporary materials to solve an old problem.
    Lynch CD; Allen PF
    Br Dent J; 2006 Mar; 200(5):258-61. PubMed ID: 16528326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An alternative and simplified technique for the impression of completely edentulous ridges.
    Carreiro Ada F; de Torres EM; Souza AA; Ribeiro RF
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(2):158-9. PubMed ID: 18348373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the stability of maxillaiy dentures: the use of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials for edentulous impressions.
    Massad J; Davis WJ; Lobel W; June R; Thornton J
    Dent Today; 2005 Feb; 24(2):118, 120-3; quiz 123, 140. PubMed ID: 15768945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.