These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8595828)

  • 1. Probability of failure of orthodontic brackets bonded with different cementing agents.
    Mitchell CA; O'Hagan E; Walker JM
    Dent Mater; 1995 Sep; 11(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 8595828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns.
    Mitchell CA; Abbariki M; Orr JF
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 10762680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets.
    Blalock KA; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 7771364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pull-out tests.
    Mitchell CA; Orr JF; Connor KN; Magill JP; Maguire GR
    Dent Mater; 1994 Mar; 10(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 7758854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics.
    Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 8059747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
    Bishara SE; Gordan VV; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9878954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements.
    Meehan MP; Foley TF; Mamandras AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 9971921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Yamada R; Hayakawa T; Kasai K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12518948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluoride release and shear bond strengths of three light-cured glass ionomer cements.
    Ashcraft DB; Staley RN; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Mar; 111(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 9082847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.