These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8596060)

  • 1. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Ersahin A; Hicks J; Wallis J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA.
    Molloi SY; Ersahin A; Roeck WW; Nalcioglu O
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Feb; 26(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 2055711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative dual-energy coronary arteriography.
    Molloi SY; Weber DM; Peppler WW; Folts JD; Mistretta CA
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Aug; 25(8):908-14. PubMed ID: 2394574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of vessel orientation on videodensitometry quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Molloi S; Dang Q; Breault J
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2862-8. PubMed ID: 14655932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography using videodensitometry. An in vivo analysis.
    Simons MA; Muskett AD; Kruger RA; Klausner SC; Burton NA; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Feb; 23(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 3277924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of a cross-sectional area of normal and stenotic arteries with videodensitometric quantitative arteriography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Molloi S; Zhang W; Leung C; Hiro T; Hicks J
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Apr; 4(4):245-52. PubMed ID: 9110021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses.
    Simons MA; Bastian BV; Bray BE; Dedrickson DR
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 3305413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries.
    Di Mario C; Haase J; den Boer A; Reiber JH; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1992 Nov; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: in vivo validation.
    Molloi S; Kassab GS; Zhou Y
    Circulation; 2001 Nov; 104(19):2351-7. PubMed ID: 11696477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometric quantitative coronary arteriography. A comparison of unsubtracted and dual energy-subtracted images.
    Weber DM; Molloi SY; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):649-54. PubMed ID: 1885271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
    Wong JT; Kamyar F; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absolute volumetric blood flow measurements using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Qian YJ; Ersahin A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 8455517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of coronary arterial calcium by dual energy digital subtraction fluoroscopy.
    Molloi S; Detrano R; Ersahin A; Roeck W; Morcos C
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 2046617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Videodensitometric analysis of human coronary stenoses: validation in vivo by intraoperative high-frequency epicardial echocardiography.
    Johnson MR; McPherson DD; Fleagle SR; Hunt MM; Hiratzka LF; Kerber RE; Marcus ML; Collins SM; Skorton DJ
    Circulation; 1988 Feb; 77(2):328-36. PubMed ID: 3338129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitation of absolute area of a coronary arterial stenosis: experimental validation with a preparation in vivo.
    Wiesel J; Grunwald AM; Tobiasz C; Robin B; Bodenheimer MM
    Circulation; 1986 Nov; 74(5):1099-106. PubMed ID: 3769167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-sectional area measurements by digital subtraction videodensitometry.
    Simons MA; Kruger RA; Power RL
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):637-44. PubMed ID: 3528036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II).
    Haase J; Escaned J; van Swijndregt EM; Ozaki Y; Gronenschild E; Slager CJ; Serruys PW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Oct; 30(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 8221861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiography.
    Theron HD; Lambert CR; Pepine CJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 66(17):1186-90. PubMed ID: 2239720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
    Sanz ML; Mancini J; LeFree MT; Mickelson JK; Starling MR; Vogel RA; Topol EJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 60(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 2955693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanism of high-speed rotational atherectomy and adjunctive balloon angioplasty revisited by quantitative coronary angiography: edge detection versus videodensitometry.
    von Birgelen C; Umans VA; Di Mario C; Keane D; Gil R; Prati F; de Feyter P; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1995 Sep; 130(3 Pt 1):405-12. PubMed ID: 7661053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.