These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8596082)

  • 1. Effect of nickel-titanium engine-driven instrument rotational speed on root canal morphology.
    Poulsen WB; Dove SB; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):609-12. PubMed ID: 8596082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments.
    Glossen CR; Haller RH; Dove SB; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 7561658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
    Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
    J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of rotational speed on root canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Karagöz-Küçükay I; Ersev H; Engin-Akkoca E; Küçükay S; Gürsoy T
    J Endod; 2003 Jul; 29(7):447-9. PubMed ID: 12877260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of instrumentation using Naviflex and Profile nickel-titanium engine-driven rotary instruments.
    Ottosen SR; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 10530251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
    Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):698-702. PubMed ID: 9587312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study on the effect of three methods of instrumentation on the shape of root canal (an in-vitro study).
    Kataia MA; el-Sayed JM; Ezzat KM; Seif RE
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr; 41(2):1105-12. PubMed ID: 9497646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium instruments.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Mühge M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Nov; 35(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 12453021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
    Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium K-files in curved root canals.
    Chan AW; Cheung GS
    Int Endod J; 1996 Nov; 29(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10332236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
    Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.