These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8596828)

  • 1. Usefulness of the routine magnification view after breast conservation therapy for carcinoma.
    DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Shaffer K; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Rolfs AT
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):341-3. PubMed ID: 8596828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnification views of mammography decrease biopsy rates.
    Madan AK; Nguyen MT; Wakabayashi MN; Beech DJ
    Am Surg; 2001 Jul; 67(7):687-9. PubMed ID: 11450790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patients: should the mastectomy site be imaged?
    Fajardo LL; Roberts CC; Hunt KR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):953-5. PubMed ID: 8273633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early breast cancer: detection of recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy.
    Hassell PR; Olivotto IA; Mueller HA; Kingston GW; Basco VE
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):731-5. PubMed ID: 2167500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does surgical closure technique affect early mammographic detection of tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy?
    Newlin HE; Indelicato DJ; Abbitt P; Marshall J; Wymer D; Grobmyer S; Haigh L; Copeland E; Morris CG; Mendenhall NP
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 32(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 19528792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation).
    Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 7839960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection.
    Kreager JA; Kornguth PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 8310913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the mammographic lesion.
    Osborne JM; Robert D
    Australas Radiol; 1989 Nov; 33(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 2633731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of spot compression-magnification and tangential views in mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses.
    Faulk RM; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 1523339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mammography and sonography in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast-preserving therapy of breast carcinoma].
    Buchberger W; Hamberger L; Schön G; Steixner G; Fritsch E
    Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 1648770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.
    Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Jahanshahi R; Gold RH; Arndt RD; Linsman J
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 3628795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of magnification and paddle compression techniques in the assessment of mammographic screening detected abnormalities.
    Hayes R; Michell M; Nunnerley HB
    Clin Radiol; 1991 Sep; 44(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 1914389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suture calcification mimicking recurrence in the irradiated breast: a potential pitfall in mammographic evaluation.
    Davis SP; Stomper PC; Weidner N; Meyer JE
    Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):247-8. PubMed ID: 2740511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast.
    Stomper PC; Recht A; Berenberg AL; Jochelson MS; Harris JR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jan; 148(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 3491522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mammographic features of the postlumpectomy, postirradiation breast.
    Harris KM; Costa-Greco MA; Baratz AB; Britton CA; Ilkhanipour ZS; Ganott MA
    Radiographics; 1989 Mar; 9(2):253-68. PubMed ID: 2538867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.