90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8596830)
1. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
Geise RA; Palchevsky A
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A circuit modification that improves mammographic phototimer performance.
LaFrance R; Gelskey DE; Barnes GT
Radiology; 1988 Mar; 166(3):773-6. PubMed ID: 3340776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.
Kruger RL; Schueler BA
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1449-54. PubMed ID: 11488578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.
Kimme-Smith C; Haus AG; DeBruhl N; Bassett LW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 9057533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography grid performance.
Rezentes PS; de Almeida A; Barnes GT
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9885613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. X-ray linear attenuation coefficients in the mammographic range for ultrasonic breast phantom materials.
Burke TM; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA
Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):755-7. PubMed ID: 7063698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an adjustable model breast for mammographic dosimetry assessment in Taiwanese women.
Dong SL; Chu TC; Lan GY; Lin YC; Yeh YH; Chuang KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Apr; 196(4):W476-81. PubMed ID: 21427314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States.
Gentry JR; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8798175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic breast glandularity in Malaysian women: data derived from radiography.
Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D; Looi LM; Moosa F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 14975974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating mean glandular dose using proprietary mammography phantoms.
Hartley LD; Cobb BJ; Hutchinson DE
Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 10028638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
