121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8596840)
1. Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis.
Hricak H; Powell CB; Yu KK; Washington E; Subak LL; Stern JL; Cisternas MG; Arenson RL
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 8596840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix.
Hricak H; Yu KK; Powell CB; Subak LL; Stem J; Arenson RL
Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S44-6. PubMed ID: 8796509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer.
Makino H; Kato H; Furui T; Morishige K; Kanematsu M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):1098-104. PubMed ID: 24320754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of tumor control in patients with cervical cancer: analysis of combined volume and dynamic enhancement pattern by MR imaging.
Mayr NA; Yuh WT; Zheng J; Ehrhardt JC; Magnotta VA; Sorosky JI; Pelsang RE; Oberley LW; Hussey DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 9423627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.
Togashi K; Nishimura K; Sagoh T; Minami S; Noma S; Fujisawa I; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Ozasa H; Konishi I
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 2928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical carcinoma with full-thickness stromal invasion: efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametrial involvement.
Iwata S; Joja I; Okuno K; Miyagi Y; Sakaguchi Y; Kudo T; Hiraki Y
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 12450104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA?
Rockall AG; Ghosh S; Alexander-Sefre F; Babar S; Younis MT; Naz S; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 16310245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy.
Yamashita Y; Baba T; Baba Y; Nishimura R; Ikeda S; Takahashi M; Ohtake H; Okamura H
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 10966715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilization of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: results of intergroup protocol ACRIN 6651/GOG 183.
Amendola MA; Hricak H; Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Chi DS; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Gatsonis C
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(30):7454-9. PubMed ID: 16234512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution MR imaging of stage I cervical neoplasia with a dedicated transvaginal coil: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings.
deSouza NM; Scoones D; Krausz T; Gilderdale DJ; Soutter WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):553-9. PubMed ID: 8623627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diffusion weighted imaging features of normal uterine cervix and cervical carcinoma].
Zhang Y; Liang BL; Gao L; Ye RX; Shen J; Zhong JL
Ai Zheng; 2007 May; 26(5):508-12. PubMed ID: 17672942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging.
Seki H; Azumi R; Kimura M; Sakai K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 9168730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Irradiation of the cervix uteri: value of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Hricak H; Swift PS; Campos Z; Quivey JM; Gildengorin V; Göranson H
Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 8210364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carcinoma of the cervix (a pilot study).
Soeters RP; Beningfield SJ; Dehaeck K; Levin W; Bloch B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Apr; 17(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2015918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
