203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8598578)
1. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
Steele F
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.
Rennie D
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
Choo V
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
Kaiser J
Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
Poon P
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Study proposed on integrity of published data.
Gavaghan H
Nature; 1994 Oct; 371(6500):733. PubMed ID: 7935825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
Parrish DM
JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Unrealistic' misconduct plans under fire.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 May; 381(6580):263. PubMed ID: 8692255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hostile reception to US misconduct report.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6584):639. PubMed ID: 8649502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
Kaiser J; Marshall E
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
Friedly J
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Of whistleblowers, investigators, and judges.
Scarr S; Ernhart CB
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 11652255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fraud case that evaporated.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
