These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Cabinet reshuffle demotes British science. Dean M Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):238. PubMed ID: 7616806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surrogate motherhood: beyond the Warnock and Brazier reports. McLachlan HV; Swales JK Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2005; 11(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 16018113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Britain opens biotech regulation to greater public involvement. Masood E Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):287-8. PubMed ID: 10360555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proceed with caution, says UK report on ethics of GM foods. Dickson D Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6735):396. PubMed ID: 10365943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far? Cannon J; Haas M Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones. Ramsay S Lancet; 1998 Dec; 352(9144):1917. PubMed ID: 11657091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Expert group to look at UK cloning law. Masood E Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Experts at work: state autonomy, social learning and eugenic sterilization in 1930s Britain. King D; Hansen R Br J Polit Sci; 1999 Jan; 29(Pt. 1):77-107. PubMed ID: 11660703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]