These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy. Osborne JW; Berry TG Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents. van Dijken JW Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy. Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longevity of low- and high-copper amalgams analyzed by preparation class, tooth site, patient age, and operator. Smales RJ Oper Dent; 1991; 16(5):162-8. PubMed ID: 1813870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol. Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Guo IY; Okabe T Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 9590909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a two year period. van der Merwe WJ J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Dec; 47(12):521-5. PubMed ID: 9511639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valiant-PhD and Lojic N amalgam alloys: four-year clinical results. Smales RJ; Rupinskas L Aust Dent J; 1991 Aug; 36(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 1789763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of high-copper dental amalgams with and without admixed indium. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 1524741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year. Meiers JC; Turner EW Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9610330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations. Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Osborne JW; Norman RD; Gale EN Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 1812507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. Osborne JW; Summitt JB Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 9545902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]