These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8599586)
21. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Mair LH Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of three amalgam alloys. Tyas MJ; Ewers GJ Aust Dent J; 1993 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8373297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Smales RJ; Wetherell JD Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners. Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials. Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial. Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a three year period. van der Merwe WJ J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jun; 48(6):329-32. PubMed ID: 9511601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage of corrosion-resistant amalgam alloy. Andrews JT; Hembree JH ASDC J Dent Child; 1975; 42(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 1100692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]