These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8599586)
41. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations. Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Alloy particle shape and sensitivity of high-copper amalgams to manipulative variables. Brown IH; Miller DR Am J Dent; 1993 Oct; 6(5):248-54. PubMed ID: 7880469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [A finely dispersed copper alloy for amalgams--a prospective filling material in pediatric dentistry. II. Clinical research]. Pobochina VV; Chuev VP Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994; 73(3):62-5. PubMed ID: 7846721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Criteria for choice of an alloy for dental amalgams]. De Valkeneer I; Bercy P Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Jun; 44(170):219-36. PubMed ID: 2088017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Relationship of restoration width, tooth position, and alloy to fracture at the margins of 13- to 14-year-old amalgams. Osborne JW; Gale EN J Dent Res; 1990 Sep; 69(9):1599-601. PubMed ID: 2398187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparison of methods for evaluating the marginal fracture of amalgam restorations. Bryant RW; Mahler DB; Engle JH Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):235-7. PubMed ID: 3868633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of Pd on the clinical performance of amalgam. Mahler DB; Engle JH; Adey JD J Dent Res; 1990 Nov; 69(11):1759-61. PubMed ID: 2229614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fit of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy crowns before and after marginal refinement by electrical discharge machining. Contreras EF; Henriques GE; Giolo SR; Nobilo MA J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12473994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Long-term influences on marginal fracture of amalgam restorations. Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6585529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations. Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Manhart J; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11005901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results. Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Class II cavity for amalgam. Proposed new modifications related to material characteristics]. Riccio C; Piccirillo P; Belnome G; Serpico R Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1990; 31(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 2100480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]