These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8599909)

  • 21. [Computer-assisted rescreening of cervicovaginal smears stained by the Papanicolaou method. Evaluation of the PAPNET system apropos of 225 cases].
    Vuong PN; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Marsan C; Baviera E
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995; 43(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 7574913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Papanicolaou smear testing in elderly women.
    Kochersberger G; Studenski S
    JAMA; 1986 Nov; 256(20):2819-20. PubMed ID: 3773196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Pap test: George N. Papanicolaou (1883-1962). A screening test for the prevention of cancer of uterine cervix.
    Michalas SP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 Jun; 90(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 10825631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of rural women in South Africa regarding the Pap smear.
    Lartey M; Joubert G; Cronje HS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Dec; 83(3):315-6. PubMed ID: 14643048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Papanicolaou screening in developing countries.
    Goldhaber-Fiebert JD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Aug; 124(2):314-5; author reply 315-6. PubMed ID: 16116686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New technology in Papanicolaou smear processing.
    Dunton CJ
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 43(2):410-7. PubMed ID: 10863637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Cytodiagnosis of cervical cancer: efficacy of the passive preventive care].
    Ejmocka-Ambroziak A; Wiczyńska-Zajac A; Kilijańczyk M
    Ginekol Pol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1157-63. PubMed ID: 11082995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervical (Pap) smear. New directions.
    Koss LG
    Cancer; 1993 Feb; 71(4 Suppl):1406-12. PubMed ID: 8381706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pap smears in perspective.
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Dec; 64(25):967-8. PubMed ID: 6648734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cytologic cancer prevention with smears of the uterine cervix and endocervical canal in pregnancy].
    Torsten U; Opri F; Weitzel H
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1515780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and utilization of the Papanicolaou smear technique.
    Lee RE
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1979; 32(7):142-4, 153. PubMed ID: 392500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pap smears in a public hospital emergency department: a failure of the system.
    Lowe RA; Berlin M
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Aug; 21(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 1497168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy comparison between PAPNET diagnoses and conventional diagnoses in an Italian cervical cytology laboratory.
    Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Oct; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9784992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved quality-control detection of false-negative Pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC system.
    Marshall CJ; Rowe L; Bentz JS
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Mar; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10086244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated rescreening of Papanicolaou smears.
    Ciatto S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Jan; 16(1):98-9. PubMed ID: 9034749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening for cervical cancer by Pap smear.
    Rehan N
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 39(4):116-8. PubMed ID: 2501528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Cervical Smears Performed by General Practitioners on the Cervical Cancer Screening Rate of their Female Patients: A Claim Database Analysis and Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Favre J; Rochoy M; Raginel T; Pelletier M; Messaadi N; Deken-Delannoy V; Duhamel A; Berkhout C
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jul; 27(7):933-938. PubMed ID: 29583084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Abnormal Pap smears, ASCUS still ob/gyn puzzle.
    Titus K
    JAMA; 1996 Oct; 276(13):1014-6. PubMed ID: 8847749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does cost-effectiveness analysis make a difference? Lessons from Pap smears. Symposium.
    Hagen MD; Garber AM; Goldie SJ; Lafata JE; Mandelblatt J; Meltzer D; Neumann P; Siegel JE; Sox HC; Tsevat J
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(4):307-23. PubMed ID: 11475387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pap smears are financially undervalued in the United States.
    Herbert A
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1218. PubMed ID: 9343333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.