77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8599925)
1. Reporting of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM; Haefner HK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Nov; 13(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 8599925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of ASCUS findings in Papanicolaou smears. A retrospective study.
Iavazzo C; Boutas I; Grigoriadis C; Vrachnis N; Salakos N
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 23327054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): human papillomavirus testing, ASCUS subtyping,or follow-up cytology?
Hughes SA; Sun D; Gibson C; Bellerose B; Rushing L; Chen H; Harlow BL; Genest DR; Sheets EE; Crum CP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 186(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 11904597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Howell LP; Davis RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Smears diagnosed as ASCUS: interobserver variation and follow-up.
Gatscha RM; Abadi M; Babore S; Chhieng D; Miller MJ; Saigo PE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Aug; 25(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 11477722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in an independent laboratory: is it useful or significant?
Lachman MF; Cavallo-Calvanese C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 179(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 9731848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colposcopic evaluation after a repeat atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smear.
Gerber S; De Grandi P; Petignat P; Mihaescu A; Delaloye JF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Dec; 75(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11728485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS) Group.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Mar; 92(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 10700419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): clinical-cytological significance.
Lambert B; Boivin Y; Lepage Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 1999 Jul; 9(4):329-332. PubMed ID: 11240788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
