190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 860017)
1. Criteria for safe working with iodine-125.
Linsley GS
Radiography; 1977 Apr; 43(508):91-3. PubMed ID: 860017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Criteria for safe working with iodine-125.
Linsley GS
Radiography; 1976 Apr; 42(496):89-91. PubMed ID: 1273291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation safety: implications for urologists and patients.
Keeley FX; Thornton M
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):443-4. PubMed ID: 19070873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Problems with radiation protection for adjuvant radiotherapy of thyroid cancer].
Siekierzyński M
Wiad Lek; 2001; 54 Suppl 1():307-11. PubMed ID: 12182040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation protection: where are we after Fukushima?
Coates R
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Dec; 34(4):E13-6. PubMed ID: 25431996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual monitoring for intakes of radionuclides by workers: design and interpretation. A report of a Task Group of Committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Ann ICRP; 1988; 19(1-3):1-315. PubMed ID: 3207251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Report on the 5th International Conference on Low Dose Radiation.
McElvenny D
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2):297-9. PubMed ID: 19461132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reply to '30th Liverpool course-is this a record?'.
Moody J
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):361. PubMed ID: 22948419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Personnel exposure during cerebral angiography.
Lam ES
Med J Malaysia; 1979 Dec; 34(2):171-3. PubMed ID: 548723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective and equivalent dose minimization for personnel in PET procedures: how far are we from the goal?
Lecchi M; Malaspina S; Del Sole A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2279-2282. PubMed ID: 27624191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Key factors in imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments using the NAME model.
Haywood SM; Bedwell P; Hort MC
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 20220209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
Haywood SM
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation protection principles for the disposal of solid radioactive waste.
Ann ICRP; 1985; 15(4):1-23. PubMed ID: 3911831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The imaging imperative meets concerns about radiation exposure.
Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):265-6. PubMed ID: 17467605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record for fluoroscopically guided procedures.
Miller DL; Balter S; Dixon RG; Nikolic B; Bartal G; Cardella JF; Dauer LT; Stecker MS;
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 22057151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 30th Liverpool course—is this a record? Comprehensive review on mobile phone technologies finds no solid evidence of health effects.
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Jun; 32(2):193. PubMed ID: 22673974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Trans-uranium elements in food products (review)].
Vasilenko IIa
Vopr Pitan; 1994; (6):20-4. PubMed ID: 7732670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [HYGIENIC ASSESSMENT OF RADIATION DOSES TO THE POPULATION OF THE VORONEZH REGION FROM SOURCES OF IONIZING IRRADIATION].
Kuzmichev MK; Stepkin YI; Klepikov OV; Kukhtina IV
Gig Sanit; 2015; 94(9):39-41. PubMed ID: 27029167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose to fingertips of staff preparing stranded iodine-125 seeds for permanent prostate implants.
van Haaren PM; van't Riet A; Moerland MA; Koedooder C; Westendorp H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Apr; 145(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 21112885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Before we cry wolf.
van Moore A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):263-4. PubMed ID: 17467604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
