These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8601879)

  • 1. The value of donor iliac artery pressure gradients in predicting the outcome of femorofemoral bypass.
    Archie JP
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 Mar; 23(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 8601879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and comparison of pressure gradients and ratios for predicting iliac stenosis.
    Archie JP
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1994 May; 8(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 8043361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significance and management of inflow gradients unexpectedly generated after femorofemoral, femoropopliteal, and femoroinfrapopliteal bypass grafting.
    Gupta SK; Veith FJ; Kram HB; Wengerter KA
    J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 2398586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of donor limb hemodynamics in femorofemoral bypass for claudication.
    Harris JP; Flinn WR; Rudo ND; Bergan JJ; Yao JS
    Surgery; 1981 Oct; 90(4):764-73. PubMed ID: 6456562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The femorofemoral graft. Hemodynamic improvement and patency rate.
    Lamerton AJ; Nicolaides AN; Eastcott HH
    Arch Surg; 1985 Nov; 120(11):1274-8. PubMed ID: 4051733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic and angiographic guidelines in selection of patients for femorofemoral bypass.
    Flanigan DP; Pratt DG; Goodreau JJ; Burnham SJ; Yao JS; Bergan JJ
    Arch Surg; 1978 Nov; 113(11):1257-62. PubMed ID: 708246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duplex ultrasound criteria for femorofemoral bypass revision.
    Stone PA; Armstrong PA; Bandyk DF; Keeling WB; Flaherty SK; Shames ML; Johnson BL; Back MR
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Sep; 44(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 16950423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Donor limb vascular events following femoro-femoral bypass surgery. A Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.
    Arch Surg; 1991 Jun; 126(6):681-5; discussion 685-6. PubMed ID: 1828143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femorofemoral bypass as an alternative to a direct aortic approach in daily practice: appraisal of its current indications and midterm results.
    Rinckenbach S; Guelle N; Lillaz J; Al Sayed M; Ritucci V; Camelot G
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 26(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 22050878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complementary distal arteriovenous fistula and deep vein interposition: a five-year experience with a new technique to improve infrapopliteal prosthetic bypass patency.
    Ascer E; Gennaro M; Pollina RM; Ivanov M; Yorkovich WR; Ivanov M; Lorensen E
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 24(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 8691516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does donor iliac artery percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stent placement influence the results of femorofemoral bypass? Analysis of 70 consecutive cases with long-term follow-up.
    Perler BA; Williams GM
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 Sep; 24(3):363-9; discussion 369-70. PubMed ID: 8808958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass.
    Gabrielli R; Ciocca F; Dante A; Musilli A; Maiorano M; Ventura M
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 52():316.e15-316.e19. PubMed ID: 29886210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of femorofemoral bypass for intermittent claudication. Clinical and hemodynamic assessment.
    Buchbinder D; Pasch AR; Schuler JJ; Meyer JP; Dillon BC; Rollins DL; Flanigan DP
    Am J Surg; 1986 Aug; 152(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 3740360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A haemodynamic evaluation of the femoro-femoral cross-over bypass.
    Lee RE; Baird RN
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1990 Apr; 4(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 2190847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Venous Conduits Have Superior Patency Compared with Prosthetic Grafts for Femorofemoral Bypass.
    Nguyen KP; Moneta G; Landry G
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 52():126-137. PubMed ID: 29783030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femorofemoral bypass for unilateral iliac artery occlusion in the presence of bilateral superficial femoral artery occlusions.
    Todd GJ; Voorhees AB; Nowygrod R; Reemtsma K
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1985; 26(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3155746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative assessment of the hemodynamic significance of iliac and profunda femoris artery stenosis.
    Archie JP; Feldtman RW
    Surgery; 1981 Nov; 90(5):876-80. PubMed ID: 7302840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of iliofemoral and femorofemoral crossover bypass in the treatment of unilateral iliac arterial occlusive disease.
    Hanafy M; McLoughlin GA
    Br J Surg; 1991 Aug; 78(8):1001-2. PubMed ID: 1913091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative evaluation of femorofemoral crossover bypass and iliofemoral bypass for unilateral iliac artery occlusive disease.
    Nazzal MM; Hoballah JJ; Jacobovicz C; Mohan CR; Martinasevic M; Ryan SM; Sharp WJ; Kresowik TF; Corson JD
    Angiology; 1998 Apr; 49(4):259-65. PubMed ID: 9555928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donor iliac angioplasty and crossover femorofemoral bypass.
    Shah RM; Peer RM; Upson JF; Ricotta JJ
    Am J Surg; 1992 Sep; 164(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 1415933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.