These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8601944)

  • 1. The SUPPORT project and improving care for seriously ill patients.
    Prendergast TJ
    JAMA; 1996 Apr; 275(16):1227; author reply 1230-1. PubMed ID: 8601944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The purpose of advance medical planning--autonomy for patients or limitation of care?
    Levinsky NG
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Sep; 335(10):741-3. PubMed ID: 8703178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Covinsky KE; Fuller JD; Yaffe K; Johnston CB; Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Phillips RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S187-93. PubMed ID: 10809474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy: all systems are not yet "go".
    Snider GL
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1995 Feb; 151(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 11654310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Setting floating limits: functional status care categories as national policy.
    Thomasma DC
    Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):133-46. PubMed ID: 11651033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The SUPPORT project and improving care for seriously ill patients.
    Solomon MZ; Jennings B; Dickey N; Pittman M; Orentlicher D; Lombard JJ
    JAMA; 1996 Apr; 275(16):1229-31. PubMed ID: 8601950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Teno JM; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Murphy D; Youngner SJ; Bellamy P; Connors AF; Desbiens NA; Fulkerson W; Knaus WA
    J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8003719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of life judgments and medical indications.
    Thomasma DC
    Qual Life Cardiovasc Care; 1986; 2(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 11659003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The SUPPORT project and improving care for seriously ill patients.
    Frank RR
    JAMA; 1996 Apr; 275(16):1228-9; author reply 1230-1. PubMed ID: 8601947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care.
    Franklin C; Weil MH
    Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insights about dying from the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Freeborne N; Lynn J; Desbiens NA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S199-205. PubMed ID: 10809476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
    Sneiderman B
    Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Older age, aggressiveness of care, and survival for seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Hamel MB; Davis RB; Teno JM; Knaus WA; Lynn J; Harrell F; Galanos AN; Wu AW; Phillips RS
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Nov; 131(10):721-8. PubMed ID: 10577294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dying at the right time: a critical legal theory approach to timing-of-death issues.
    Ikuta SS
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):3-66. PubMed ID: 2695495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doctors often fail to heed wishes of the dying patient.
    Gilbert S
    N Y Times Web; 1995 Nov; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11647685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate consent.
    Richards N
    Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The illusion of autonomy at the end of life: unconsented life support and the wrongful life analogy.
    Peters PG
    UCLA Law Rev; 1998 Feb; 45(3):673-731. PubMed ID: 11660813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The patient as citizen and consumer: socially responsible education about advance directives.
    Weber LJ
    Prof Ethics; 1993; 2(1-2):113-27. PubMed ID: 11652260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
    Malloy SE
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.