BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8602252)

  • 1. Panel softens cancer gene test warning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6575):573. PubMed ID: 8602252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic tests forge ahead, despite scientific concerns.
    Marshall A
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Dec; 14(13):1642-3. PubMed ID: 9634835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A common BRCA1 mutation in the Ashkenazim.
    Goldgar DE; Reilly PR
    Nat Genet; 1995 Oct; 11(2):113-4. PubMed ID: 7550331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review panel cancels meeting as gene therapy proposals fall.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6567):668. PubMed ID: 11644770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer, the genetic "quick fix," and the Jewish community. Ethical, legal, and social challenges.
    Rothenberg KH
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1997; 7(1):97-124. PubMed ID: 10167180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A public health perspective on the control of predictive screening for breast cancer.
    Cunningham GC
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1997; 7(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 10167177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Green light for gene therapy in healthy volunteers.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Apr; 15(4):314. PubMed ID: 9094121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer research. Transatlantic war over BRCA1 patent.
    Balter M
    Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5523):1818. PubMed ID: 11397923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH researchers receive cut-price BRCA test.
    Hollon T
    Nat Med; 2000 Jun; 6(6):610. PubMed ID: 10835655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can ELSI's principles inform consensus?
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Jun; 14(6):677. PubMed ID: 9630964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice.
    Holtzman NA; Murphy PD; Watson MS; Barr PA
    Science; 1997 Oct; 278(5338):602-5. PubMed ID: 9381169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH under fire over gene-therapy trials..
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6767):237. PubMed ID: 10659820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does genetic engineering need genetic engineers?: should the regulation of genetic engineering include a new professional discipline?
    Auchincloss S
    Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1993; 20(1):37-63. PubMed ID: 11652234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene therapy investigations proliferate.
    Hollon T
    Nat Med; 2000 Mar; 6(3):235. PubMed ID: 10700200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Warning on cancer gene screening.
    Lehrmann S
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6467):88. PubMed ID: 8139665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. As US DNA advisory body redefines itself.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US bioethics panel poised to judge local review boards.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Oct; 383(6600):466. PubMed ID: 8849708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic testing for cancer: a complex decision.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2001 Feb; 8(6):2-4. PubMed ID: 11175466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orkin-Motulsky panel calls for gene therapy basic research.
    Fox JL
    Gene Ther; 1996 Jan; 3(1):pre-1. PubMed ID: 11644882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH panel proposes guidelines for human gene therapy research.
    Med World News; 1984 Dec; 25(23):7. PubMed ID: 11645538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.