These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8602420)
21. Is digital better in dental radiography? Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Specific features of monitoring the characteristics of digital X-ray diagnostic systems]. Zelikman MI Med Tekh; 2002; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 12512272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The evaluation of a digital system for the automatic analysis of the density of abdominal radiograms]. Braccini G; Bertellotti L; Boraschi P; Marrucci A; Caramella D; Salvetti O; Evangelista R; Bozzi R Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):65-9. PubMed ID: 8480051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices. Sanderink GC; Miles DA Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):249-55, v. PubMed ID: 10740767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems. Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation. Busch HP; Faulkner K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-cost teleradiology for dentistry. Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Eraso FE; Kuroyanagi K Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9063230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs. Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor]. Bai J; Chen H Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Flash Dent: an alternative charge-coupled device/scintillator-based direct digital intraoral radiographic system. Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Kelly MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8181653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pixel perception and voxel vision constructs for a new paradigm of dental care. Farman AG N Y State Dent J; 1994 Apr; 60(4):34-7. PubMed ID: 8190395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality. Benz C; Mouyen F Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-assisted interpretation in radiographic diagnosis. van der Stelt PF Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):683-96. PubMed ID: 8224340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film. Farman AG; Farman TT Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advances in imaging in oral medicine. Miles DA Alpha Omegan; 2001; 94(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 11480184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Usefulness of a new industrial radiographic paper in dental radiography in place of radiographic film]. Bernhardt H; Maus G; Schienbein H Quintessenz; 1982 Dec; 33(12):2439-44. PubMed ID: 6963449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Xeroradiography--an alternative to radiography?]. Espelid I Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1980 Apr; 90(6):181-5. PubMed ID: 6929477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]