These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Loma Linda guide: a stereolithographically designed surgical template: technique paper. Kleinman A; Leyva F; Lozada J; Patel RD J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(5):238-44. PubMed ID: 19882820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prosthetically-guided implant placement: the provisional restoration and the surgical template. Starr NL Dent Implantol Update; 1994 Apr; 5(4):29-32. PubMed ID: 7873763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Rehabilitation of an edentulous mandible with an implant-supported prosthesis. LoCascio SJ; Salinas TJ Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 9(3):357-68; quiz 370. PubMed ID: 9553506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis. Verde MA; Morgano SM J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Mar; 69(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 8445558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Simplified radiographic-surgical template for placement of multiple, parallel implants. Solow RA J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 11174674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A stent for presurgical evaluation of implant placement. Takeshita F; Tokoshima T; Suetsugu T J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 9029463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Use of a thermoplastic vacuum-formed matrix for secure engagement of an implant surgical template. Oh WS; Saglik B J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):326-7. PubMed ID: 18922264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Precision surgical template for implant placement: a new systematic approach. Wat PY; Chow TW; Luk HW; Comfort MB Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 12121608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Practical applications of a computed tomography system for predictable implant placement. Roberts J; Roberts M Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 20(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 18777706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Pickup impression technique for fabricating the surgical template for implant placement and provisional restoration. Mitrani R; Phillips K Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 16(5):389-91. PubMed ID: 15344588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Surgical templates for function and esthetics in dental implants. Small BW Gen Dent; 2001; 49(1):30-2, 34. PubMed ID: 12004672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Three-dimensional templates for placement of root-form dental implants: a technical note. Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):787-93. PubMed ID: 8990642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]