These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8603149)

  • 1. A comparison of the compressive strength of calcium hydroxide based lining materials.
    Shazad N; Kennedy JG
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Sep; 3(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 8603149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of pH changes induced by calcium hydroxide liners.
    Gençay K; Seymen F; Selvi S; Kiziltan B
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(7):560-2. PubMed ID: 15259972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical properties of dental base materials.
    Lewis BA; Burgess JO; Gray SE
    Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 1524749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cements and eugenol on properties of a visible light-cured composite.
    Powell TL; Huget EF
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength of base materials.
    Carvalho RM; Del'Hoyo RB; Suga RS
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):128-30. PubMed ID: 8599588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two liner materials for use in the ferric sulfate pulpotomy.
    Mohamed N
    SADJ; 2008 Jul; 63(6):338, 340-2. PubMed ID: 18811097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rationale for use of bases with amalgam restorations.
    Bartlett DW
    Dent Update; 1992 Dec; 19(10):413-4, 416-7. PubMed ID: 1303355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pH changes of four different root canal sealers after mixing at various time intervals in vitro.
    Evcil MS; Colak M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):71-8. PubMed ID: 15558092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage between different types of base materials.
    Suliman AA; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Feb; 67(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 1311379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Resistance of calcium hydroxide, zinc oxide-eugenol and polycarboxylate cement to amalgam condensation].
    Curti Júnior A; Fichman DM; Pagani C
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1979 Aug; 6(5):34-9. PubMed ID: 296679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quantification of tertiary dentine formation in response to materials commonly placed in deep cavities in general practice in the UK.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V
    Prim Dent Care; 1996 Mar; 3(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 8941804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of amalgam condensation on the integrity of insulating cements and liners.
    Hembree JH
    S C Dent J; 1979; 37(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 293889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of Dycal under amalgam restorations.
    Pereira JC; Manfio AP; Franco EB; Lopes ES
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 2076226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simulated clinical appraisal of base materials for amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Wing G
    Aust Dent J; 1976 Aug; 21(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1070964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amalgam restoration and in vitro caries formation.
    Grossman ES; Matejka JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 7722937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect on marginal microleakage of using a combination of cavity varnishes and calcium hydroxide intermediary bases--an in vitro study.
    Ben-Amar A; Liberman R; Nordenberg D; Renert H; Gordon M
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 3868784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.