154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8604080)
1. Bicortical-monocortical fixation of the sagittal mandibular osteotomy.
Schwartz HC; Relle RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Feb; 54(2):234-5. PubMed ID: 8604080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in monkeys: a comparison of monocortical and bicortical fixation.
Hu J; Zhao Q; Tang J; Zheng Z; Qi MC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 45(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17027127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rigid fixation of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Fujimura K; Bessho K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1170-3. PubMed ID: 21802187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of mandibular stability after sagittal split osteotomies: biocortical versus monocortical osteosynthesis.
Fujioka M; Fujii T; Hirano A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 11108524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: bicortical fixation using a 2.0-mm locking plate system versus monocortical fixation using a nonlocking plate system.
Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Alam S; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 66(5):900-4. PubMed ID: 18423278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of inferior alveolar disturbance restoration after sagittal split osteotomy by means of bicortical versus monocortical osteosynthesis.
Fujioka M; Hirano A; Fujii T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Jul; 102(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9655405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The need for intermaxillary fixation in sagittal split osteotomy setbacks with bicortical screw fixation.
Choi BH; Zhu SJ; Han SG; Huh JY; Kim BY; Jung JH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Sep; 100(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 16122655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sagittal splitting and bicortical screw fixation of the ascending ramus.
Souyris F
J Maxillofac Surg; 1978 Aug; 6(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 279637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro strength analysis of sagittal split osteotomy fixation: noncompression monocortical plates versus bicortical position screws.
Anucul B; Waite PD; Lemons JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Dec; 50(12):1295-9. PubMed ID: 1447609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical correction of mandibular excess: technical considerations for mandibular setbacks.
Tucker MR
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 8118659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are bicortical screw and plate osteosynthesis techniques equal in providing skeletal stability with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy when used for mandibular advancement surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Moraissi EA; Al-Hendi EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1195-200. PubMed ID: 27185389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic stereophotogrammetric evaluation of intersegmental stability after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation.
Wall G; Rosenquist B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 59(12):1427-35; discussion 1435-6. PubMed ID: 11732029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.
Chuong CJ; Borotikar B; Schwartz-Dabney C; Sinn DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15635560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yamashita Y; Otsuka T; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 21185151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis and comparison of clinical results of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy performed with the use of monocortical locking plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Kabasawa Y; Sato M; Kikuchi T; Sato Y; Takahashi Y; Higuchi Y; Omura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):e333-41. PubMed ID: 22831752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The sagittal splitting osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Spiessl B
Clin Plast Surg; 1982 Oct; 9(4):491-507. PubMed ID: 7172597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
