These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8604561)

  • 21. CytosafePLUS. A workstation for screening, supervision, reviewing, quality assurance and education in cytopathology.
    Vooijs GP; Nauwelaers FA; van Aspert-van Erp AJ
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 8604581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Partial re-screening of all negative smears. A method of quality control of pathology department concerning smear screening against cervix cancer].
    Jensen ML; Dybdahl H; Svanholm H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3024-7. PubMed ID: 10850190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determining the utility and effectiveness of the NeoPath AutoPap 300 QC System used routinely.
    Fetterman B; Pawlick G; Koo H; Hartinger J; Gilbert C; Connell S
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 9987444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Too early to solve Pap device puzzle.
    Check W
    CAP Today; 1997 Jun; 11(6):1, 44-6, 48-9 passim. PubMed ID: 10174227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rescreening for quality control in cytology.
    Melamed MR
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 8604563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Quality of vaginal smear for cervical cancer screening: a concordance study].
    Cendales R; Wiesner C; Murillo RH; Piñeros M; Tovar S; Mejía JC
    Biomedica; 2010; 30(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 20890555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Internal quality assurance of sensitivity of primary screening.
    Boxer ME
    Cytopathology; 1998 Oct; 9(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 9800134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AutoPap 300 QC system scoring of cervical smears without "epithelial cell abnormalities".
    Colgan TJ; Bon N; Lee JS; Patten SF
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9022725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A gridded Pap slide to assure quality with high throughput.
    Sechler GE; Goldsmith S
    Am Clin Lab; 1991 Apr; 10(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 10150102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A perspective on modern quality control methods.
    Hutchinson ML; Lapidus SN; Inhorn SL; Papillo J
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(4):837-41. PubMed ID: 8693909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Planning, execution and results of automated vaginal cytological diagnosis].
    Naujoks H; Sprenger E
    Gynakologe; 1990 Dec; 23(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 2279707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervicovaginal smear, true or false?
    Davila RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 8279443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New system for reporting Pap smears.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Sep; 3(9):65, 68. PubMed ID: 2641691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detecting false negative smears.
    Soloway HB
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1853-4. PubMed ID: 9390156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Papanicolau smears: reducing the false negative rate by improving the method].
    Biran G; Levy T
    Harefuah; 2004 Mar; 143(3):217-21, 245. PubMed ID: 15065363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Weekly rescreening of 10% of the total cervical Papanicolaou smears: a worthwhile quality assurance scheme.
    Sampatanukul P; Wannakrairot P; Promprakob U; Yodavudh S; Anansiriprapa C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87 Suppl 2():S261-5. PubMed ID: 16083199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. PAPNET Testing System. Technical update.
    Denaro TJ; Herriman JM; Shapira O
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9022728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.