These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8604572)

  • 21. Can we change the way we screen?: the ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Dawson AE
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 15540250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monolayer slide preparation and automated slide reading systems for cervical cancer screening--clinical-effectiveness analysis.
    Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 1998 Feb; ():34-9. PubMed ID: 10183359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Labeling liquid-based systems: FDA clarification.
    Gutman S
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):1120. PubMed ID: 11127746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. European guidelines on cervical screening.
    Smith JH; Desai MS
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cervical smear.
    Drake M
    Aust Fam Physician; 1991 Jan; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 2003817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
    Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated screening for cervical cancer: diagnostic decision procedures.
    Bartels PH; Wied GL
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9022719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The use of colposcopy in the diagnosis of malignant changes of the uterine cervix].
    Hahnemann N
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1972 May; 134(20):1048-53. PubMed ID: 5041794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ABC3 and LBC - adequate or not?
    Duvall E
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 23869916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CYBEST-CDMS; automated cell dispersion and monolayer smearing device for CYBEST.
    Tanaka N; Ikeda H; Ueno T; Okamoto Y; Hosoi S
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 7258859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The prevention of cervical cancer: the place of the cytological smear test.
    Hudson E
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Mar; 12(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 3888487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. False-negative smears in gynaecological cytology.
    Katz L; Hinberg I; Weber F
    Lancet; 1979 Mar; 1(8115):562. PubMed ID: 85155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Gynecological cytodiagnosis with screening (a solution from necessity)].
    Janisch H; Kremer H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1969 Nov; 91(45):1488-90. PubMed ID: 5376960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Impulse cytophotometric measurements on atypical cell smears from vagina and cervix uteri].
    Göhde W; Dittrich W; Zinser KH; Prieshof J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 May; 32(5):382-93. PubMed ID: 4558244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cervix correlated cyto-histological study.
    Gupta S; Rao MC; Gupta IM; Gupta YN; Khanna S; Sanyal SK; Prakash A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1979 Apr; 22(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 489088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Blinded review of Papanicolaou smears.
    Gill GW
    Cancer; 2005 Apr; 105(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 15662699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The false negative smear. II. The trapping effect of collecting instruments.
    Rubio CA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):576-80. PubMed ID: 850573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ.
    York GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 108(1):114. PubMed ID: 9208986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
    Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.