BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8604576)

  • 1. Roche Image Analysis Systems, Inc.
    Knesel EA
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 8604576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuromedical Systems, Inc.
    Mango LJ
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8604575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NeoPath, Inc. NeoPath AutoPap 300 Automatic Pap Screener System.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Nelson AC
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8604574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer catcher. Neural net catches errors that slip through Pap tests.
    Rennie J
    Sci Am; 1990 May; 262(5):84. PubMed ID: 2333498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.
    Kaminsky FC; Benneyan JC; Mullins DL
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CYTYC Corporation.
    Zahniser DJ; Sullivan PJ
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8604572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated screening for cervical cancer: diagnostic decision procedures.
    Bartels PH; Wied GL
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9022719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stanley F. Patten, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. and the development of an automated Papanicolaou smear screening system.
    Lee JS; Nelson AC
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 9438457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The FDA review process: obtaining premarket approval for the PAPNET Testing System.
    Mango LJ
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):138-40. PubMed ID: 8604567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated cytologic screening devices and malpractice liability.
    Skoumal SM; Cohen MB
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Aug; 17(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 9258613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted quality assurance.
    Wied GL; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Gupta PK; Gurley AM; Hilgarth M; Jiménez-Ayala M; Kato H; Knight BK; McGoogan E; Medley G; Meisels A; Nishiya I; Nozawa S; Ramzy I; Reith A; Rilke F; Rivera-Pomar JM; Rosenthal DL; Schenck U; Verhest AP; Vooijs GP
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8604561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
    Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of automated systems for the analysis of cervical smears.
    Coleman DV
    Cytopathology; 1998 Dec; 9(6):359-68. PubMed ID: 9861528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The irrigation smear. A comparative trial of vaginal irrigation pipette and spatula smears in the detection of cervical cancer.
    Husain OA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Jan; 106(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 5410384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
    Michelow PM; Hlongwane NF; Leiman G
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AutoCyte Interactive Screening System. Experience at a university hospital cytology laboratory.
    Howell LP; Belk T; Agdigos R; Davis R; Lowe J
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 9987451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False-negative smears in gynaecological cytology.
    Katz L; Hinberg I; Weber F
    Lancet; 1979 Mar; 1(8115):562. PubMed ID: 85155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Terminology, benchmarking and reporting in cervical cytology automation: the critical need for consistency.
    Krieger P; Naryshkin S
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 8604580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.