These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8604579)

  • 1. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Comparison of monolayers to conventional smears.
    Sprenger E; Schwarzmann P; Kirkpatrick M; Fox W; Heinzerling RH; Geyer JW; Knesel EA
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 8604579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening? Overview and evaluation of systems available.
    McGoogan E; Reith A
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 8604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
    Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
    Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the CytoRich monolayer preparation system for cervical cytology. A prelude to automated primary screening.
    Takahashi M; Naito M
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1785-9. PubMed ID: 9390142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited.
    Greening SE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1985; 1(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3836072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the CytoRich slide preparation process.
    Laverty CR; Farnsworth A; Thurloe JK; Grieves A; Bowditch R
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9196807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
    Vassilakos P; Griffin S; Megevand E; Campana A
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
    Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ThinPrep Processor. Clinical trials demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens.
    Wilbur DC; Cibas ES; Merritt S; James LP; Berger BM; Bonfiglio TA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 8116577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The preparation of additional smears from a cervical scrape: impact on the rate of detection of cervical neoplasia.
    Al-Awadhi R; Byrne M; Coleman DV
    Cytopathology; 2001 Jun; 12(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 11380556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
    Linder J; Zahniser D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Shingleton HM; Patrick RL; Johnston WW; Smith RA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1995; 45(5):305-20. PubMed ID: 7656133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
    Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Berry M; Larson MA; Bentz JS
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
    Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pap smear refined.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of monolayer preparations for cervical cytology: emphasis on suboptimal specimens.
    Vassilakos P; Cossali D; Albe X; Alonso L; Hohener R; Puget E
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 8669185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.